Hon. Julie E. Carnes See Rating Details
Circuit Court Judge See Comments
C.C.A  
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation
Add a comment only

Ratings

How familiar are you with the work of this judge?:   (1=Not at all familiar,10=Extremely familiar)
Participates in Oral Argument:   (1=Rarely,10=Always)
Quality of Questions During Oral Argument:   (1=Poor,10=Extremely insightful)
Attitude during oral argument:   (1=Consistently inappropriate,10=Consistently respectful)
Scholarship as reflected in Opinions:   (1=Poor,10=Outstanding)
General Inclination in Criminal Appeals:   (1=Strongly Pro­Government,10=Strongly Pro­Defense)
General Inclination in Civil Rights Appeals:   (1=Strongly Pro-Defendant,10=Strongly Pro­Plaintiff)
General Inclination in Labor Law Appeals:   (1=Strongly Pro­Employee,10=Strongly Pro­Employer)
General Inclination in Immigration Appeals:   (1=Strongly Pro­Immigrant,10=Strongly Pro­Government)
Comments



What others have said about Hon. Julie E. Carnes


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: 20992
Rating:9.5
Comments:
I found her to be very fair and balanced. She was prompt and courteous.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 20796
Rating:2.9
Comments:
Doesn't manage her docket very well; slow to rule on motions (8+ months).

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 19838
Rating:9.0
Comments:
Extraordinarily gifted jurist and brilliant legal mind. Takes time to give every case a full, thorough, erudite review. Extremely bright. A model for other judges.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: 19350
Rating:1.2
Comments:
very slow on ruling on motions and very lazy - hates certain kinds of cases that she deems should not be in federal court, such as in-rem property matters. Guess she forgot to read the case law about the court having the obligation to adjudicate matters properly before it. Also rather fuzzy on the standards for Erie v. Tompkins. Not very bright.