Hon. George C. Hanks, Jr See Rating Details
Magistrate Judge See Comments
S.D.Tex.  
Average Rating:7.0 - 3 rating(s) Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation
Add a comment only

Ratings

*Temperament:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Scholarship:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Industriousness:   (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation:    (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Punctuality:    (1=Chronic`y Late,10=Always on Time)
*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation:    (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation:   (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Flexibility In Scheduling   (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Pre-Trial:   (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions:   (1=Least Involved,10=Most Involved)
Comments



  Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating

What others have said about Hon. George C. Hanks, Jr


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 19480
Rating:1.7
Comments:
The general public is outraged about the way this judge handles civil matters; he encourages some attorneys to "Forum Shop for Venue." Judge Hanks does not give equal access and protection to all who appear before him in his court; he abuses power and rules with indiscretion and he is biased; he allows some attorneys to commit fraud on the court; he is unjust and therefore can't dispense justice fairly.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 13288
Rating:9.2
Comments:
Judge Hanks is extremely fair and courteous to the parties and works hard to get to the core of issues. He also has a good analytical mind and helps resolve differences.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 12670
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Judge Hanks was assigned to mediate a complex trade dress infringement case in which I represented one of the parties. While the case did not settle at mediation the parties later entered into a confidential settlement agreement before trial using the framework that Judge Hanks helped develope. Judge Hanks treated the parties with respect during the mediation, was quick to understand the complicated issues and was very insightful in helping the parties understand the strengths and weaknesses of their respective cases. He was very dilgent as he worked with the parties for approximately 10 hours before concluding the mediation. Although this was my first experience with Judge Hanks I found him to be one of the finest judges I have had the opportunity to appear before in my 32 year career. I consider it a privilege to have worked with him.