Hon. Carlos Eduardo Mendoza See Rating Details
District Judge See Comments
M.D.Fla.  
Average Rating:3.3 - 4 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation
Add a comment only

Ratings

*Temperament:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Scholarship:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Industriousness:   (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation:    (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Punctuality:    (1=Chronic`y Late,10=Always on Time)
*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation:    (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation:   (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Flexibility In Scheduling   (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Pre-Trial:   (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions:   (1=Least Involved,10=Most Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Trial:    (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Sentencing:    (1=Most Lenient,10=Most Harsh)
Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators:    (1=10%,10=100%)
  Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Carlos Eduardo Mendoza


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: 35474
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Terrible. Get away from him asap. He's the future of Florida which is why people moving there are idiots.

Litigant

Comment #: 35343
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Horrible biased Judge with minorities and pro se and almost a dictator and do not care to follow the law.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 35156
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge abused his discretion by dismissing a case for no justifiable reason under the totality of the circumstances.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 32767
Rating:7.8
Comments:
This judge granted a directed verdict motion which in my opinion had good grounds (it was mine). He was somewhat harsh with the deadlines, but not out of line