Hon. Anne C. Conway See Rating Details
District Judge See Comments
M.D.Fla.  
Average Rating:2.6 - 25 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:



Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation
Add a comment only

Ratings
*Temperament:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Scholarship:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Industriousness:   (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation:    (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Punctuality:    (1=Chronic`y Late,10=Always on Time)
*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation:    (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation:   (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Flexibility In Scheduling   (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Pre-Trial:   (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions:   (1=Least Involved,10=Most Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Trial:    (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Sentencing:    (1=Most Lenient,10=Most Harsh)
Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators:    (1=10%,10=100%)
  Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Anne C. Conway


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 35242
Rating:1.0
Comments:
clueless judge. makes decisions based on who she prefers. ask her how she prefers a particular party.

Send e-mail to this poster 7/3/2023 8:33:41 AM

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 35215
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Ignores incriminating evidence. arbitrarily rules in favor of deep pocketed parties. Hard to believe this judge has a law degree. He existence on the bench is a total disgrace to the legal system

Send e-mail to this poster 5/24/2023 3:26:35 PM

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 34876
Rating:1.0
Comments:
She is for the rich, against all others. She has a feeble grasp of the law. mentally lacking the requirements to be a judge. A total incompetent

Send e-mail to this poster 9/5/2022 3:51:05 PM

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 34698
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Applies old turned over case law to make a decision. Doesn't know what she is doing, her opinions speak for themselves in her blatant incompetence in applying mandatory case law. She is inept at deciphering legal precedent

Send e-mail to this poster 7/5/2022 11:07:34 AM

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: 33364
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
We must have Judge Conway removed from her position. Her latest decision of siding with powerful Disney against people with autism is suspicious at the very least. We must contact the media, file complaints against her and do whatever is necessary. I'm going to reach out to Ron Desantis to see if he can help.

Send e-mail to this poster 7/9/2020 1:05:18 PM

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 32771
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge is the poster child as to why term limits are needed for federal judges.

Send e-mail to this poster 8/19/2019 9:03:19 AM

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: 32648
Rating:6.1
Comments:
Horrible.

Send e-mail to this poster 6/6/2019 1:48:10 AM

Litigant

Comment #: 29014
Rating:1.0
Comments:
uses decade old overturned case law to dismiss a case in summary judgment.

a total disgrace to the bench

She shouldnt be allowed to judge a dog show

Send e-mail to this poster 11/20/2018 10:43:00 AM

Other

Comment #: 25380
Rating:2.0
Comments:
To even make myself believe this is a federal judge makes me really throw up in my mouth. A lawauit should never be labeled as weird when looking at the substantive and civil rights laws which she obviously has no clue about it is troxel v. Granville and meyer v. Nebraska that even allowed this judge to be where she is so she is weird and obnoxious. She does protect the rich corporations because this is where the money lies, no money in protecting a persons const. Rights. What a quack job and we can only wish ahe studies our constitutiom a bit more.

Send e-mail to this poster 5/11/2018 11:15:02 PM

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: 25180
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Serves the rich and powerful. uses inapplicable case law to rule on a case for her rich buddies. She isn't capable of being a judge in a pie eating contest

Send e-mail to this poster 1/28/2018 2:11:26 PM

Other

Comment #: 23696
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
A snob of a judge that has no right wearing a rob! She obviously doesnt know what it's like to have a chils with autism.

Send e-mail to this poster 8/22/2016 8:10:48 PM

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 22352
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Not qualified. Does not know substantive law. Does not know civil procedure or evidence or how to run a trial. The last person who should have a lifetime appointment to anything. With no accountability and an abusive temperament, this is what you get.

Send e-mail to this poster 2/1/2015 3:10:03 PM

Other

Comment #: 21487
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I cannot stand this judge. She was recently in the paper, crying that her budget to pay her employees is depleted -- yet she sent my friend back to prison for thirty days? You spent more money sending him back to jail, than any lesson that could be learned would have cost? Either shut your pie hole about your budget or smarten up. To send someone to federal prison for an additional thirty days costs a lot of money in processing, transportation, etc.

Send e-mail to this poster 2/11/2014 2:43:53 PM

Litigant

Comment #: 21344
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I can't rate her because I want to believe that she was bamboozled by the defense counsel and that, in the end, she will do the right thing.

Send e-mail to this poster 12/23/2013 6:23:04 PM

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: 19132
Rating:1.8
Comments:
Querulous and juvenile in presiding. Needs some basic skills training in ruling on objections and grasping evidentiary concepts.

Impartiality is a judge's most important qualification. She lacks that.

Ann Coulter's politics and a little of that same personality.

Send e-mail to this poster 12/5/2012 4:19:30 PM

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: 13821
Rating:1.7
Comments:
Lack of neutrality is her defining feature. She is for the rich, against all others. She has a feeble grasp of the law. Does not work hard.

Send e-mail to this poster 3/30/2012 4:04:32 PM

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 13541
Rating:1.5
Comments:
She is just not neutral, so it does not matter what the law is. People can not plan their lives around their legal rights if a judge will not respect them. We don't have a queen, so no one person can overturn congress, the president, and all the court precedent, but that is how she operates.

Send e-mail to this poster 2/20/2012 2:23:38 PM

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 12722
Rating:1.7
Comments:
A transactional background may explain a glaring weakness in understanding the rules of evidence and making correct rulings on objections. Takes a lot of shortcuts; does not seems to care much about doing a good job. Very shrill and ill-tempered and unpleasant.

Send e-mail to this poster 8/9/2011 4:56:51 PM

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 12107
Rating:2.2
Comments:
Lacking in self-control, almost childlike, easily confused and disoriented, fragile emotionally. Strongly favors one side in a case.

Send e-mail to this poster 3/30/2011 4:54:27 PM

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 12083
Rating:2.0
Comments:
Servant of wealth and power. No sense of neutrality or impartiality.

Unhappy person with weak trial skills and unpleasant demeanior and temperament.

Send e-mail to this poster 3/19/2011 4:52:05 PM

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 8688
Rating:8.6
Comments:
Handles massive caseload, but very sharp with the law. One of the best on the court.

Send e-mail to this poster 5/21/2009 7:56:03 AM

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 5044
Rating:10.0
Comments:
One of our best judges. Has the courage to pull the trigger on legal issues.

Send e-mail to this poster 10/11/2007 9:42:30 PM

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 2483
Rating:2.2
Comments:
Worse Federal Judge I have ever seen in my life. Obviously has personal agenda of being miserable and not even handed. Completely defense oriented to the point of where you wish she would recuse on every case she is on. Does not know the law either

Send e-mail to this poster 9/21/2006 12:20:34 PM

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 2471
Rating:1.3
Comments:
Seems decidedly anti-plaintiff in civil litigation.

Send e-mail to this poster 9/20/2006 9:31:43 AM