Hon. Thomas G. Wilson See Rating Details
Magistrate Judge See Comments
Average Rating:2.1 - 4 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      
Add a comment only


*Temperament:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Scholarship:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Industriousness:   (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation:    (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Punctuality:    (1=Chronic`y Late,10=Always on Time)
*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation:    (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation:   (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Flexibility In Scheduling   (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Pre-Trial:   (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions:   (1=Least Involved,10=Most Involved)
  Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating

What others have said about Hon. Thomas G. Wilson


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 22710
Rating:Not Rated
It would be nice if Judge Wilson had learned any actual law during his 275 years on the bench. Better yet, he could start reading the law attorneys put in front of him now.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 22082
His judicial demeanor is nonexistent. His bias against plaintiffs in employment cases could not be more obvious.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: 19780
Terrible magistrate. Combines a savage lack of intelligence with arrogance as well as any I have seen. He is the poster child for a government employee who abuses his power so regularly that he has become completely unaccountable to the law or anything else. He has actually been comfortable enough to comment that he has historically had a practice of throwing out types of cases he does not think should be brought, such as section 1983 cases.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 6474
Conservative and possibly biased.