Hon. Carmen E. Bosch See Rating Details
Circuit Judge
County Court
Baldwin County
28th Circuit
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 4 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Carmen E. Bosch


Comments


Other

Comment #: AL75
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Agree with all previous comments. Totally ignored facts, allowed other party to get away with lies even after admitting to them, did not act in the interest of the child, did not listen to the child psychologist recommendations, unlawfully didn't allow facts prior to the previous order in court-even though the previous order was through mediation and the facts were never heard by the court. Did not seem to care about the case but to be paying attention to computer the whole time.

Other

Comment #: AL74
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Poor and pathetic and highly unprofessional. Simply collecting a pay check. A lazy and biased judge. Ignores evidence, even that which is undisputed. Does not look at best interest of a child. Bottom 1 percent and highly unprofessional among state court judges across the country. A judge should never act impulsively, insult the tax paying parties who are paying her salary and rule without contemplation. Alabama is ready for a better, more contemplative and more mature trier of fact. Time to get out of the Stone Age and do away with judges who are
lazy, biased and archaic thinkers who know the court of appeals are unlikely to reverse their uninformed and biased decisions.

Litigant

Comment #: AL40
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Her behavior goes from sweet genuflection to sharp and nasty...and frightening...in the blink of an eye without apparent stimulus -- manic? Appeared to not be aware of, or ignored, State law and guidelines.

Other

Comment #: AL37
Rating:1.0
Comments:
judge has a horible temper. she runs the courtroom like she is the God appointed king over man kind. she steps above the law and rules with wreckless abandon. her morality and sence of what is just and true are clearly deminished to nothing. her cort room is nothing more than a business. Do not continue to let this pathetic excuse for an authority figure continue to spread her disease amoungst the good people of this country.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: AL35
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Bases decisions on personal agenda not on the law.