Hon. Catherine M. Easter See Rating Details
Judge
Superior
Anchorage County
Third Judicial District
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 3 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Catherine M. Easter


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: AK39
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
This crook should be criminally charged for giving sex offenders full custody of a child. She was 100% biased while on the bench as she says it herself. She likes to humiliate the other side. She "overrules" specifically because she's afraid of ones power. I cannot believe she is still allowed to be called a judge- I have heard bad things from this women all around she needs to be derobed.

Litigant

Comment #: AK38
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Prejudged a case 2 days before trial. They said they were bias on the audio. Superficial decision, ignored other side outright. Policed hearing. Hijacked direction of proceedings. Not willing to explore alternative theories. Rushed and/or cut off the party she clearly did not like.

Litigant

Comment #: AK30
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Poor. Prejudged a case I watched. Appeared bias to one attorney from the outset of the first day. Poorly reasoned decision.

Litigant

Comment #: AK10
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Catherine Easter is discriminatory, biased, and does not follow Alaskan law. She has been known to steer proceedings, and does not read through the entire case prior to making a ruling.