Hon. Janice Crawford See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge
Superior Court
Maricopa County
See Comments
Mesa

Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   2.0 - 5 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Janice Crawford


Comments


Other

Comment #: AZ1773
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Did not get her facts straight. Put children in dangerous home after testimony of a person who was proven to have lied. Even ignored the counselor's concern about the home the children were placed in. Did not recognize parents progress towards reunification. Only wanted to destroy the family. All for DCS destruction of families!

Vote her out of office!

Litigant

Comment #: AZ1766
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Bias against self-represented parties.

Other

Comment #: AZ1682
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
She is very bias towards race and sex. Completely disregards children who are currently being abused in foster homes; even when evidence is presented. She needs to be removed from the bench because of her lack of judgment. A juvenile jugde indeed. She would rather see children in misery. Once that judgment is made everyone's children becomes out of site out of mind. She works with dcs . What dcs says dcs gets with this jugde

Litigant

Comment #: AZ1270
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Pro father despite what other reviews say. Gave my ex everything and a bag of chips that he asked for

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: AZ1265
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Very bias judge towards men

Other

Comment #: AZ575
Rating:10.0
Comments:
She backed all of her decisions with laws, and was fair. She paid close attention to all that was said in her courtroom.

Litigant

Comment #: AZ569
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge is very pro-mom. She is not up to speed on the current laws regarding equal parenting time. She disregarded documented issues of child abuse and mental illness of the other parent. She needs to be removed from the bench.