Hon. Scott Sulley See Rating Details
Judge
Justice of the Peace Court
Pinal County
See Comments
Maricopa

Attorney Average Rating:   1.8 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Scott Sulley


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: AZ613
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This man was incredibly rude, unethical, bigoted and completely full of himself. I'm astounded his behavior was tolerated by those in the court system who might have been aware of the extent of his corruption. My son had to appear for a truancy hearing along with about 7 other kids. Mr Sulley sentenced my son to 40 hours of community service to be completed within 2 weeks: he dismissed all the other kids' cases. He threatened to put my son in a juvenile delinquent facility if he failed to complete the community hours. My son had to MISS SCHOOL to do this and also got very very sunburned as there are only certain hours available to do the service hours. That was only a small part of the unbelievable experience we had with Mr Sulley. Suggestion: avoid at all costs.

Other

Comment #: AZ422
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This man is in no way impartial as he should be when ruling in the courtroom. he needs to learn that as a publicly elected official he should be able to maintain professional composure at all times and especially while within the courthouse.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: AZ212
Rating:1.8
Comments:
If he likes you, he will coach you through the entire process. If he doesn't like you, it does not matter how in the right you are, he does not want to hear it. My ex-husband was able to get a Order of Protection against me because our divorce stated I can talk to my kids at my ex's discretion; after not talking to my kids for a year (since he's using his discretion ordered by Judge Kevin White). Sulley issued him an OP against me and told me once he tells me to stop calling, then I can not call to talk to my kids. I can only have contact via attorney. I was responded with "I will call whenever I want, if he can't pass the phone to a child then he has no business raising my kids. I will not be polite, I will not say please. It's very simple 'Put the kids on the phone', I have nothing more to say to him. Now I'm in the appeal process. Pinal county is the worst place to live, I walked into Sulley's court with 1/2 of my face swollen and I was told I can not get an OP for domestic violence it has to be harassment, but my ex can get an OP for me calling my kids?