Hon. William N. Lundy See Rating Details
Justice of the Peace Court
Yavapai County
See Comments
Verde Valley

Attorney Average Rating:   3.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   2.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

What others have said about Hon. William N. Lundy


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: AZ216
very poor indeed! He is not fair or impartial. His personal life is of greater importance to him than his position or being fair in handling matters in court. He lacks compassion and ethic. He is unable to treat disabled citizens and veterans fairly, as he displays a certain attitude toward such person.


Comment #: AZ215
He lacks ethic and compassion, he displays egocentric and neurotic behavior with an outward negative attitude and was in no way understanding or atleast caring in regards to resolving a civil matter of a writ of replevin to regain rightful possession of a vehicle taken from this disabled veteran. He didn't want to grant the fee waiver until I sited federal and state law provisions and even then, he only granted the waiver to throw the case out of his court based on a statute of limitations which does not exist as such in this instance.
After experiencing his lack of professionalism, it is in my humble opinion, he should be investigated and possibly have his official bond revoked along with his robe.
This is suppose to be an office of a public servant who has taken an oath and is expected to uphold that oath. This merits looking into. Someone should replace him. If nobody runs against him, he should be replaced by the appointment of his superiors.