Hon. Boyd Dunn See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge
Superior Court
Maricopa County
See Comments
Mesa

Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   3.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Boyd Dunn


Comments


Other

Comment #: AZ1143
Rating:3.0
Comments:
Was very disappointed to watch Boyd Dunn keep such poor control of his courtroom. Petitioners lawyer grilled respondent for 30 minutes after a bunch of hoopla and then respondents lawyer only had 5 minutes on the stand. He was on the ball but since the order was not issued until 5 weeks later it was obvious he had forgot all about the false allegations, fake CPS reports filed by Petitioner and the withholding of the children. In addition to forgetting he also mistakenly wrote that respondent who was paying $4K a month to petitioner took a pay cut a year after he did so he could not get credit for over payment. Respondents lawyer said it would not help to file as he would not change his mind, even though it was an obvious mistake. Nice guy, but bad lawyer. Respondent wont be using him again.