Hon. Michael Herrod See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge
Superior Court
Maricopa County
See Comments
Phoenix

Attorney Average Rating:   2.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Michael Herrod


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: AZ746
Rating:2.0
Comments:
This judge listened to my case, (I sent a FAX about what I believe to be facts) I expressed my FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS by voicing my opinion. Judge Herrod, at the request of the company attorney, placed a "RESTRAINING ORDER" on me, then he let the opposing council "SEAL THE CASE", (so I couldn't let the public & INVESTORS, know what was going on. No opinion of mine counted, the judge just sat there in a daze most of the time and made this decision when all was said. THIS JUDGE DID THE SAME TO MY DAUGHTER, (IN THE SAME CASE).
This action with a restraining order and the case sealed, left my daughter and I, both in a situation as we can't get a judge to UNLOCK THE CASE. Very BAD JUDGE to sit there and act as if he could care less what was happening, just sided in with the company.