Hon. Danielle Viola See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge
Superior Court
Maricopa County
See Comments
Phoenix

Attorney Average Rating:   3.6 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   3.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Danielle Viola


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: AZ2291
Rating:3.6
Comments:
As a civil judge, she has been overturned on appeal for failing to properly consider all the facts and evidence. As a judge hearing appeals of administrative decisions, she likewise fails to consider all the substantive legal issues.

Litigant

Comment #: AZ2223
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Can be replaced with a Robot Judge.

Litigant

Comment #: AZ1859
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
a true judge that deserves her seat. treats people like human beings not animals . she has respect for people and impose respect without being rude . I will vote for her as we need more people like her instead of judges that believe they are God

Other

Comment #: AZ1809
Rating:3.0
Comments:
Her demeanor may initially come across as polite but often she is short and will interrupt parties. She assumes a position and refuses to budge when provided more informtation that proves otherwise. Viola can’t be incorrect and appears to need to be the “brightest in the room.” Acts pompous and privileged. So cold and often ending hearings by leaving behind a trail of ice. Viola’s facial expressions cut deep. Better bring your hearing aides or a tape recorder because if you ask her to repeat herself, you’ll get that unforgiving attitude. Heaven forbid you miss what she says. Be cautious going into her court room because you’ll never know if she will be hot or cold.