Hon. Timothy Thomason See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge
Superior Court
Maricopa County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   4.2 - 6 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 6 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Timothy Thomason


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: AZ2661
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Follow up on a prior ruling. The damage done to my child in the year she was sent to live with her father against the advisers reccommendations for supervised only and the No Contact OOP this idiot overturned is unrepairable. A counselor when evaluating my daughter asked what kind of trama took place between the ages of 2-3. She's now 8 ... [redacted by Ed.]

Other

Comment #: AZ2399
Rating:1.0
Comments:
He appears to be a misogynist of the meanest kind, stripping mothers of their children and women of their wealth.

Other

Comment #: AZ2189
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Assigned a court appointed advisor to our custody case since we had conflicting testimonies, advisor deemed father should be on supervised visits and despite failing 2 random UA's and Missing 2 in a 4 month period AFTER 2 other judges granted and insisted a NO CONTACT order needed order of protection for child and myself he still sent our child for unsupervised time which put our child in common in extreme danger and medical records of father prove that. Still tangled in the system because of this bad judgement call. Seemed very biased because father is a veteran and should be disrobed at min never serve in family court.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: AZ2112
Rating:10.0
Comments:
I had a dispute with my business partner and the Judge was very professional and forth coming. I didn’t have an attorney at the time and my business partners lawyer was there (on the phone) and the judge was terrific! He was very knowledgeable with the Operating Agreement and told the lawyer a few things that shut down the other side right away. I was scared to death but he was very kind and I felt like I had hope! I left that phone meeting feeling like the Judge was there to enforce the law and not make it go one way or the other. He gave great explanations on what he said. I just wanted the truth to be told. I’m the little guy(gal).
Thank you Judge Thomason!

Other

Comment #: AZ2045
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
To rule against Mountainside Fitness is a travesty of justice. There was not proof that people using the gym has done anything to increase CoVid. You deserve to be voted out of your position!

Other

Comment #: AZ2044
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Bias, judge who is NOT for the people, business or community. By deciding against Mountainside Fitness, you set a precedence of tyranny and gave our state politicians free rain to make arbitrary decisions that not only destroy businesses, but destroy the lives of the citizens of this state. The increase in mental health issues and suicide is at the hands of this judge who is arbitrarily denying me and every citizen in this state the right to keep myself health through exercise. My 14th amendment has been stripped from me and I will not tolerate this tyranny.

Litigant

Comment #: AZ1997
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Lack of review of prior evidence. Did not read pretrial statements. Denied right to go to Court of appeals. Denied right of extension for new counsel even when only 30 days days left. Granted emergency temporary orders without a Court motion.

Court Staff

Comment #: AZ1994
Rating:2.0
Comments:
Appears emotional and biased. Worked in same law office with one parties attorney, did not disclose and appeared biased in favor of party who shared law office.
Seems knowledgeable about law unfortunately choses to do his own thing instead. Harmful to society.

Court Staff

Comment #: AZ1941
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Do not vote for him. He is a waste of tax payer money. He sides with money. Crooked celebrities. He is on the side of Hollywood dirty money and not hard working tax payers from his own state. Vote him out. Before he allows you to be ripped off. One sided and has no clue about moral values. I feel sorry for his children, grandkids, wife, cause a mockery was made in His courtroom and he allowed a felon who isnt from this state and cannot voter to win over a hard working man who voted for him . Our system is a joke

Litigant

Comment #: AZ1940
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
As a citizen of Arizona. I lost a case with this judge. The celebrity Tiny Lister lied and won. JUDGE Thomason agreed in this felon who didnt even know why he went to prison. THOMASON WILL NEVER GET MY VOTE ILL SEE TO THAT HE NEVER GETS TO WEAR THAT ROBE AGAIN. Our system is broken and lives can be ruined by celebrities who are above the law

Other

Comment #: AZ1931
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Observation in a child custody case. I found Timothy Tomlinson to be rude, one-sided and condescending. I absolutely did not see any fairness in anyway or the ability to be objective. This judge was clearly bias I felt so sorry for the person who is trying to get fairness in allowing them to express their situation. If it was me I would’ve gotten a different judge.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: AZ1927
Rating:2.6
Comments:
Remains on case despite conflict of interest with attorney. Unjudicial. Believed to be dangerous for children involved in family court.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: AZ1586
Rating:1.4
Comments:
Ignores caselaw and statute and rules. Abhorrent treatment of people on the stand and off it. Extreme unjudicial.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: AZ1506
Rating:8.5
Comments:
Had problem understanding the workings of ERISA pension plan benefits for Surviving Spouse and fact that surviving spouse is designated at Respondent's retirement date and cannot be changed when Respondent and Claimant are divorced, and the fact that the surviving spouse benefit DOES NOT pass to the Beneficiary's Estate at time of his/her death.