Hon. Randolph A. Bartlett See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge
Superior Court
Mohave County
See Comments
Lake Havasu

Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Randolph A. Bartlett


Comments


Other

Comment #: AZ491
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
He was very unfair. I have three children that i had joint custody of and he for absolutely no reason took my custody. I am a great full time father and he wouldnt hear anything my witnesses or my attorney had to say. He just rolled his eyes and treated everyone on my side horrible.

Litigant

Comment #: AZ430
Rating:1.0
Comments:
In my opinion he is a partial and Bias. He was the Judge in my guardianship case and refuse to address the proven lies by the respondent and treated my witnesses and my witnesses as criminals. Rolling his eyes as they testified. Allowing the respondent witnesses that were not diclosed to the plantiff. But would not allow plantiff to introduce documents.