Hon. Rick Lambert See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge
Superior Court
Mohave County
See Comments
Kingman

Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   2.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Rick Lambert


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: AZ1450
Rating:3.0
Comments:
Lambert takes sides. A judge is not supposed to "care" who wins. He is supposed to be impartial, but Lambert takes sides. After he picks his side, he doesn't listen to the other party any longer. He continually asked the opposing party "if there is anything else to add," while not allowing me to fully explain myself. When he handed out his ruling in my case, he called me names and was insulting. He gave the other party legal advise, when they didn't know how to obtain documents. I looked into his history. While he is allowed to decide custody, he also appears to be the same judge who hears and judges restraining orders. How much do you think he listens to women complain about domestic violence? My case appeared to be decided mostly by emotion instead of fact.

Other

Comment #: AZ1449
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge appears very biased without professional etiquette or jurisprudence. It additionally appears he references his own decisions instead of actual state statues.