Hon. Sarah R. Simmons See Rating Details
Presiding Judge
Superior Court
Pima County
See Comments
Tucson

Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Sarah R. Simmons


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: AZ694
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Judge Sally Simmons and her Agenda Group AWLA continue to discriminate against fathers and hardworking citizens. She is intelligent when it comes to law but she only applies it by utilizing it to maneuver and discriminate against fathers in Pima County! Simmons continues to ignore truth and accountability and appoints commissioners who will discriminate and who will ignore public concerns of usurping activities of our justice system in Pima County! By law she and her agenda group have committed fraud, extortion, theft and clear evidence based child endangerment!

Prosecutor

Comment #: AZ435
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Protect the children of Pima County and Vote No for retention of all judges in Pima County Superior Court And AZ Supreme Court who asignes the Superior Court Judges!

Arizona Supreme Court:
A. John Pelander III

Court of Appeals, Division II:
Peter J. Eckerstrom
Philip G. Espinosa
Joseph W. Howard
Virginia Kelly

Superior Court in Pima County:

Karen S. Adam
Gus Aragn
Deborah Bernini
Kyle A. Bryson
Carmine Cornelio
Jane L. Eikleberry
Richard S. Fields
Richard Gordon
Howard Hantman
Jan E. Kearney
Kenneth Lee
Leslie B. Miller
Michael Miller
Scott H. Rash
Sarah R. Simmons
Christopher P. Staring
Paul E. Tang
Stephen C. Villarreal

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: AZ167
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Has not removed Jan E. Kearney who is a direct friend of Michael Cruikshank who authorized and concealed criminal activities and civil right violations against fathers and children of Pima County.