Hon. Kevin D. White See Rating Details
Presiding Judge
Superior Court
Pinal County
See Comments
Florence

Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Kevin D. White


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: AZ211
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
This is the worst judge ever! I filled for divorce and custody, he removed my kids from me as custodial parent and gave them to their absentee father, while ordering me supervised visitation. For 13 months it was a 1 woman circus, the respondent had no case other than AZ provides both parents to a trial. My ex had no valid id, marijuana possession, history of bi-polar...nothing was investigated. At one point he told me my kids would be better off with my ex living in South Phoenix. He completely ignored my petition, not even my last name was changed back to my maiden name. Every thing I asked the court to do, ie supervised visitation for my pothead ex, and full legal custody for me, he gave it to my ex. At the end of the trial he told me the next time your ex take your kids it's not kidnapping now he has the legal right to do whatever he wants, and ordered me to stay away from my kids. Did I mention I was a full time mom with my kids and he gave them to my ex who lost his job during our divorce. I even had a best interest attorney and family conciliator services who's only concern was "everyone is on the same page" as the judge. Screw mom, now that dad has lost his job tell mom to get a job and pay child support. My ex even admitted he was suicidal during our divorce. all he had to do was show up, he is definitely anti mom.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: AZ198
Rating:1.0
Comments:
first i must say to any person that has or will have a case in front of this judge if u can have this judge removed from your case right away.this judge has no problem doing away with your constitutional rights such as the 14th amendment (right to due process) and the 1st amendment (freedom of speech) this judge has made it clear that a parent can come to his court and commit perjury lie under oth use meth,abuse pain pills,and drink, abuse a child what an injust by this judge and the family court and the laws of this state and the supreme court rules.