Hon. Roger Brodman See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge
Superior Court
Maricopa County
See Comments
Phoenix

Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   4.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Roger Brodman


Comments


Other

Comment #: AZ596
Rating:4.0
Comments:
He seems to have a fair amount of etiquette, and he says a bunch of good things, but his judgement in my case (family court) was way off the mark. The long and the short of it is, he is new to the family court bench and doesn't seem to be able to find his rear end with both hands when it comes to family law (Title 25). He totally bought in to the theatrics, and actually stated that he was rather incompetent in basic math (seriously, he couldn't figure out basic mathematics, and therefore "found" that my children wouldn't be able to, either, which they very much do), and he did it while spewing a bunch of regurgitated FC rhetoric about how much they care, best interest of the child, blah, blah, blah. He either has that shallow a cerebral capacity, or the domestic violence coalition owns his seat. I wish that I could suggest something to help the readers who stumble onto this comment; the best advice that I could give is to hope for the best and to absolutely prepare for the worst with this guy. Hopefully, you're on the right side of the political forces behind that courtroom, because he won't be doing much for you otherwise.