Hon. Rosa Mroz See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge
Superior Court
Maricopa County
See Comments
Phoenix

Attorney Average Rating:   7.0 - 3 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   7.0 - 3 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Rosa Mroz


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: AZ1636
Rating:10.0
Comments:
She is in complete control of her courtroom. It runs with precision. Be prepared with your oral arguments. She’s read everything & will grill you, Definitely not a judicial activist.

Litigant

Comment #: AZ1635
Rating:10.0
Comments:
She is a very smart & compassionate. I felt she really listened to what. I had to say.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: AZ1583
Rating:1.0
Comments:
A Janet Napolitano appointee, she is very agendist. She cares about her political agenda issues more than the law. She once had counsel in chambers as the respondent had admitted in pleadings to being an illegal immigrant, having three pieces of real property in AZ, AHCCCS benefits, fake social, etc. Mroz said that she did not want to end up on the 5:00 news and asked if counsel for respondent would like to withdraw the pleading. Another time, on a criminal matter, she just completely failed to see a very straight-forward issue in a motion to suppress evidence, where the police admitted that they did not have probable cause to enter a young mother's home. Police, without probable cause admitting that there was no reason to enter the house, entered the home, kicked in a door inside the house, rounded up the children and interrogated them. Young mother had to plead to a class 6 undesignated felony, but the police were admittedly wrong. Judge should "get it" but she sided with law enforcement. Classic fruit of the poisonous tree, and there was no case against mother. Forced mom to enter plea agreement unnecessarily. Don't trust Mroz' reasoning ability.

Other

Comment #: AZ552
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Good decision to release Debra Milke on bail.

I like the look of her background. She has a good understanding of child abuse, which is very relevant to this case.

Prosecutor

Comment #: AZ123
Rating:10.0
Comments:
She is a very fair judge. She is always prepared and often knows more about the case than the people who appear in front of her. Judge Mroz also knows the law and applies the facts to the law, instead of making up her own sense of what the law should be.

Other

Comment #: AZ76
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Doesn't actually read through all documents as a judge always should when making decisions. Seems very one-sided.