Hon. Lynn Williams See Rating Details
Circuit Judge
Supreme Court
Garland County
Eighteenth Circuit West
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   3.3 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Lynn Williams


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: AR79
Rating:3.3
Comments:
Needs lessons in humanity.

Other

Comment #: AR78
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
WOW! I thought judge Hughes was the worst judge in AR. Williams is irrational.

Litigant

Comment #: AR66
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This Judge has ended my visitation with my children TWICE. Both times were Ex Parte motions with no reasoning on the first and completely false misrepresentations on the second

These actions have been mainly due to favors performed for my ex mother in law [Redacted by Ed.] who was a counselor to the youth population of the Garland County Jail.

This domestic turned probate case shows blatant bias and prejudice.

This case has been continued due to my judicial complaint filed with The Arkansas Judiciary Discipline Committee which is headed up by [Redacted]

It was continued indefiniteiy until the complaint is finalized.

My children are in danger [Redacted by Ed.]