Hon. W. Michael Reif See Rating Details
Circuit Judge
Supreme Court
Pulaski County
Sixth Circuit
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.4 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. W. Michael Reif


Comments


Civil Litigation - Govt.

Comment #: AR80
Rating:1.4
Comments:
This judge would not make Thad sappington stop abusing me. He allowed the mother to retaliate against me by filling unlawful contempt’s in me in my divorce that ginger sappington filed for on her sons behalf. Handled his case, hired a referral from the divorce attorney and long time family friend of the sappington’s Sam Hilborn family calls him Sammy . The referral was hired to take mykids from me . The son’s name and information was never entered correctly in the court or police data so the order of protection would not do a thing twice it was entered in another mans name . The relative to the sappingtons is a state employee 33 years out of department of corrections Melissa Kitta. I’m certain there was fowl play in these orders being changed in the system. Which kept me under server stress as well as a divorce they kept drawing out for two years when I complained of abuse the mother charged me court cost by making unlawful court charges against me and asked that all cost be held till the final hearing two years later and they charge me every bit of my share I was to receive from the 401k annuity. To the sum of 23k and in a year opened up a case against me only with OCSE claiming I owed her 9,500 within four months they suspended my license to drive and license to work my job why the son has not worked in five years and mother pas all living and gas to stalk me everyday of my life. The law will do nothing .