Hon. Paula S. Rosenstein See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
San Diego County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   4.8 - 3 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   5.0 - 4 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Paula S. Rosenstein


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: CA53182
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Absolutely the BEST. Walk into her courtroom and the BS ends right there. She is so experienced that she can cut right through in the crux of the matter and get the point. I love her. If I had her as my judge she would have saved me years of litigation. She is kind to both parties, but will quickly call BS. And she does this based on not only experience, but thorough and detailed analyses of issues at hand. The Best.

Litigant

Comment #: CA51443
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
`Oh my God. What she did. She has to know my house is suffering break ins to change documents. My documents do get taken and I am extremely unsafe. She has totally helped a judge who retaliated and long story, just about all my civil rights down the toilet and a totally fabricated narrative. shocking how she is ok with totally damaging fabrications. The original judge seemed to have a bigoted component against a religion So. She pushed over a fair judge and came down from the 10th floor to accomplish this.Same day an answer from 10th floor was dated.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA48867
Rating:1.0
Comments:
She oversees the court in the Executive 10th floor. I think that presents a conflict of interest. She intervenes in cases to make sure due process does not exist. Also these matters involve forced entries that would allow for paperwork that she has backdated.

Other

Comment #: CA48794
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judicial referee is mean and talks over litigants. She doe snot listen to law and does what she wants. Will keep her spiteful soul in prayer. She is clearly not following the Maxims or Canons!

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA11204
Rating:3.4
Comments:
This judge hates men. If you are a man, stay away.

Litigant

Comment #: CA10323
Rating:10.0
Comments:
An extremely ethical judge who does her homework and has knowledge of the law. She is a diamond in the rough.

Other

Comment #: CA9874
Rating:2.0
Comments:
Another judge who hates men's rights.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA7910
Rating:10.0
Comments:
I appeared before Judge Rosenstein on a number of occasions. I've always been impressed by her understanding of the law and the rules of evidence. Above all, her kindness and patience are most remarkable.

Other

Comment #: CA4519
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I cannot imagine anyone more fit to be a judge. I've known her as a law student, an attorney, and now as a judge. She is the epitome of what a judge should be (caring, compassionate, and committed to following the law).

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA4305
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I had the unfortunate experience of dealing with her in civil litigation before she became a judge. My opinion of her is low. I found her to be devious, unfair, untruthful and nasty. No doubt these traits have carried over into her judgeship.