Hon. Christopher K Lui See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Los Angeles County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Christopher K Lui


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA16669
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
The Attorney's that own the website WWW.THEROBINGROOM.COM at North Law Publishers, Inc based in New York have been compromised and have made it their daily business to delete all post that are made to their website since the CJP Audit began. https://www.law.com/therecorder/2018/09/19/judicial-discipline-records-face-first-ever-audit-after-deal-ends-dust-up/?slreturn=20190018213912.

Anyone that has had their rights violated by any of these Judges if they did not follow the Law nor the Judicial Cannons, get your complaints in to the Commission on Judicial Performance and make sure you send a copy of the complaint to the State Auditor.

If you have had the following Judges from any courthouse please file a complaint with the Commission on Judicial Performance cjp.ca.gov/file_a_compla… :

COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 14400
San Francisco, California 94102

You can mail the complaint or fax it to (415) 557-1266

Also, send a copy of the complaint to the State Auditor auditor.ca.gov/contactus The Commission on Judicial Performance is currently undergoing an audit. sfchronicle.com/news/art…. If you have filed complaints in the past please send a copy of that complaint to the State Auditor.

California State Auditor
Attn: CJP Audit Team
621 Capitol Mall
Suite 1200
Sacramento, California 95814

Whistleblower Hotline (800) 952-5665

Report all Judges that abuse their power and do not follow the Judicial Cannons.

courts.ca.gov/documents/…

calbar.ca.gov/Attorneys/…

cjp.ca.gov/pending_cases

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA16066
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Denying sanctions on a motion to compel where the responding party didn't answer is ridiculous. Terrible judge!