Hon. Carl H Moor See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Los Angeles County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   10.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 3 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Carl H Moor


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: CA25611
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Judge Carl Moor and his associates, just threw women back 50 years. This is a slap in the face to all victims of abuse, all disabled from the abuse, slap in the face to Obama's fight for women, victims of domestic abuse, and their rights.

Corporations have more rights, in the Bill of Rights, with bad law, Citizen's United, than private citizen victims have been afforded; while Moor and his associates ignored good law to protect women , victims of abuse, the disabled.

Appellate judge, Judge Carl Moor, selectively ignored facts, evidence, merits, and made up his own, while protection rogue , corrupt colleagues and admitted abusers ( which made him and his associates, just as bad).

Women must speak up......Judges who violate he Constitution, protect the corrupt, should not hold the seat that they hold...never be elevated in this seat, they are holding.


--Many are watching our cases and what has gone down and many who have seen everything are still stunned.

Litigant

Comment #: CA25610
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Judge Carl Moor and his associates, just threw women back 50 years. This is a slap in the face to all victms of abuse, all disabled from the abuse, slap in the face to Obama's fight for women, victims of domestic abuse, and their rights.

Corporations have more rights, in the Bill of Rights, with bad law, Citizen's United, than private citizen victims have been affirded; while Moor and his associates ignored good law., facts, evidence, merits, while protection rogue , corrupt colleagues ( which made him and his associates, just as bad).

Women must speak up......Judges who violate he Constitution, protect the corrupt, shouls not hold the seat that they hold...never be elevated in this seat, they are holding.

Many are watching our cases and what has gone down and many who have seen everything are still stunned.

Other

Comment #: CA25602
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Appellate judge, Carl Moor, formerly a family law judge, seems to be part of "the circle.

Just read Judge Carl Moor's rulings and protection of violent male abusers, while victim blaming the female victim to another level of outrageous statements, to protect rogue, family law judges and lawyers, while showing his blatant prejudice, embroilment , prejudice and gender animus against the femaale victim.

--Besides Judge Moor appearing to have dirty ears, from all of those who appeared to have whispered (or talked loudly) in them.

Other

Comment #: CA25601
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Appellate judge, Carl Moor, formerly a family law judge, seems to be part of "the circle.

Just read Judge Carl Moor's rulings and protection of violent male abusers, while victim blaming the female victim to another level of outrageous statements, to protect rogue, family law judges and lawyers, wjhile showing his blatant prejudice, embroilment , prejudice and gende animus against female....besides appearing to have dirty ears, from all appearences of those who whispered (or talked loudly) in them.

Other

Comment #: CA12556
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judges totally incompetent and spineless. His rush to judgment with all the evidence in hindsight totally ignored it and did not have the balls to undermine the mediator decision. Be told me put my kids in danger when he himself heard the testimony of my kid's mom marrying a violent individual and he still Had the balls to say it was in good faith. Why don't you have your kids go live with a violent individual.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA11940
Rating:10.0
Comments:
The best judge I have ever appeared in front of.

Other

Comment #: CA10592
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Hon. Carl H Moor needs to be removed from the bench! He allowed automatic restraining orders to be broken. Because he was "overwhelmed" and there was too many numbers for him to wrap his head around, he cost me $289k in my divorce settlement. My ex and his parents put over $400k in liens on the community property, after separation, he did nithing about it.

Litigant

Comment #: CA10509
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Horrible Judge....Denied me from presenting facts of law when it was visibly present in my case. Their was Contempt, Forgery, Fraud, Perjury, Conspiracy. Judge Moor denied a valid 170.6 motion. Denied a motion filed by ex wife to quash a restraining order. This Judge should be in jail for his Fraud Upon The Court....