Hon. Carl H Moor See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Los Angeles County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   10.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 3 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Carl H Moor


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: CA31922
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
31921

*There

*There are many other forums. Difficult to believe, that an "Editor" -would have so many misspelled words, w/ grammatical errors (even forgetting about, placement of commas. )

Other

Comment #: CA31921
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
311891

Strange that the RR "Editors"-- failed to comment, on the repetitive sexist , racist comments--written on Judge Elizabeth G. Macias,Judge Hurwitz, Judge Dhanidina,(seems like by a disgruntled, unhinged male lawyer-w/an axe to grind--) who has written horrific, offensive, sexist ,racist comments...Judge Elizabeth G. Macias, Judge Hurwitz and Judge Dhanidina, among others....

__Arguably, someone guilty and unraveling, wants truthful comments,deleted. They're are many other forums.

Litigant

Comment #: CA31920
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
311891

Respectfully, redacted by Ed????"Litigant" "???.....

...."bleeive"- "informaiton"-"integrioty"-- "judical"...???? ......what 'your' should do .?

[Balance Redacted by Ed.]
COMMENT By Editor, below:

________"Poster: If you "bleeive" [SIC] you have "informaiton [SIC] related to any judge's ethics, "integrioty" [SIC] or the legality of any judical [SIC] action you certianly know what your [SIC] should do with that important information..." ?????---RR Editor???

---^^Respectfully, this comment was redacted by RR "Editor"???

Litigant

Comment #: CA31919
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
CA31918

*Division 5

Supreme Court justice, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, has died at the age of 87. She will be remembered for many things, including being a legal pioneer and for champion for women's rights and gender equality....

How will Carl Moor and **Division 5 (Baker, Kim and Rubin)-- be remembered?

...Or, will they be remembered by the way, they egregiously treated, powerless, female victims, of documented Domestic Violence and Abuse-because they were more worried for helping and covering for rogue, cowardly, family law colleagues and malfeasant lawyers'-who are in bed-- in bed w/ their equally compromised colleagues.....

Litigant

Comment #: CA31918
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
______Supreme Court justice, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, has died at the age of 87. She will be remembered for many things, including being a legal pioneer and for champion for women's rights and gender equality. She rose to the top of her class at Columbia Law School, in the 1950s, helped battle gender discrimination as a lawyer for the ACLU.


_____How will Carl Moor and Division (Baker, Kim and Rubin)-- 5 be remembered? Or, will they be remembered by the way, they egregiously treated, powerless, female victims, of documented Domestic Violence and Abuse-because they were more worried for helping and covering for rogue, cowardly, family law colleagues and malfeasant lawyers'-who are in bed-- in bed w/ their equally compromised colleagues? Moor and Division 5, also protects crybaby, miscreant family law lawyers who cried and ran to judges who they are in bed with, pulling at their tainted robe strings; asking for questionable help--to "prevail" at all costs and to help cover for their sins and secrets--(along w/ their accomplice judges and lawyers.)

___I will continue to fight for my civil rights' and justice--and what a can of worms/snakes --they left memorialized. in their tainted paper trail. They helped no one-but for their own political purposes--(along w/the egos, wallets of some judge/lawyer compromised, conflicted, morally/ethically corrupt, colleagues)

Litigant

Comment #: CA31891
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
---Dear Constitution; I wish you a speedy recovery, from the egregious assault, inflicted upon you, perpetrated by Division 5 Ass. "justices'"-Carl Moor, Lamar Baker and Dorthy Kim, under the 'leadership' OF 'CJ' L. Rubin, when they stomped on you and everything you stand for.......in a glaring miscarriage of justice

[Balance Redacted by Ed.]

[Poster: If you bleeive you have informaiton related to any judge's ethics, integrioty or the legality of any judical action you certianly know what your should do with that important information.

Posting, innuendo, suspicion, repetitive opinions and facts that we are not capable of verifying on this site ad nauseam is inapproprate. We understand your low opinion of certain judges who you beleive have wronged your. Your positino has been noted in nnumerable postings. It's time to move on.

Editor]

Other

Comment #: CA31673
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
- Ass. Justice, Carl Moor, only looks out for his own interests, those of his cronies. Carl Moor, disregards the rule of law and constitution, while protecting former family law cronies and connected family law lawyers'- as well as, protecting favored lawyers, who are in bed with his crony family law, judge buddies.

- Ass. "Justice", Carl Moor and his Division 5 buddies, Ass."Justices" Lamar Baker and Dorothy Kim, under leadership of C.J.Laurence Rubin, completely disregard civil liberties, the rule of law and the constitution; especially, when it suits them to help cover and protect, miscreant inferior court judge and lawyer, Family Law Division, buddies and it suits them to play politics, while ignoring constitutional rights, lawlessness, ethical violations, and glaring conflicts of interest.


- Putting so much power, in the hands of Carl Moor and Division 5, is not the system, our founders intended , or designed.

- The drafters' of the Constitution recognized this, realizing that those in power, would attempt seek more power; while often abusing, this type of power, as Carl Moor and Division 5 have done.

-In order to stop any branch, public official, or person from becoming too powerful, the Constitution was devised, to limit each; while also having checks and balances.

-As Madison stated, that the aim from preventing abuse of power and abuse of public office, was to divide and arrange,several offices, in such a manner, as that "...each may be a check, on the other."

- Carl Moor and Division 5, under failed leadership, of C. J. Laurence Rubin, have also failed to do their jobs, in our constitutional system of checks and balances, while showing contempt for the rule of law and the constitution.

Division 5, serving one, or more cronies, at a time.

Litigant

Comment #: CA31393
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Comment #: CA31391

.....*violent ex.


".....In my opinion, my *violent ex.---had "bought" his protections with the family and Appellate courts (among others) --by hiring a connected, rogue lawyers.. -while the family courts, Division 5 , continued to demean, humiliate victim blame me-protect my ex--who had hired a lawyer , who is in a relationship with a family law judge--and I was self represented. .."

Litigant

Comment #: CA31392
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
....Let's NOT forget--ABC was the single media outlet , who had the Ba**s to provide coverage of #SELMAmarch

“We must never ever give up, we must never ever give in...” - John Lewis -


I CAN'T BREATHE"......-- " GEORGE FLOYD-( also My **exact same testimony -against my perjuring, violent ex.)


--There must be justice, accountability, for wrongdoers..JUSTICE and reparations for their victims.

#RESTin POWERJohnLEWIS

.....#BLOODySunday


....#POWERofOurVOICES&MEDIA

Litigant

Comment #: CA31391
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
.....This is NOT --"he said-she said"-- my violent ex. repeatedly lied and victim blamed me-denying the abuse--under oath--until he was tangled up-and then admitted to the abuse and physical assaults ...

.....In my opinion, my violent had "bought" his protections with the family and Appellate courts (among others) --by hiring a connected, rogue lawyers.. -while the family courts, Division 5 , continued to demean, humiliate victim blame me-protect my ex--who had hired a lawyer , who is in a relationship with a family law judge--and I was self represented. My ex. later hired another friend, of his lawyer-as I was still self-represented, w/ my request for attorney fees denied, due process denied.... SOD -denied which I twice requested, of Lawrence Riff-- as bully, abusive, attorneys' of my abusive ex. --continued to violate rules of court, civil procedure, make material misrepresentations, which negatively affected, outcome of case.

.......In my opinion, sexist, abusive, cowardly and compromised, former family law judge, Carl Moor and his equally compromised cronies,..... in the 2nd District, Court of Appeal, Division 5, and Moor's 'boss man' CJ, Laurence Rubin, along with Moor's cowardly associates, -- associate justices Lamar Baker and Dorothy Kim - do not deserve a seat on any bench; as they have participated and allowed, glaring miscarriages of justice, to take place,...........along with glaring constitutional and civil liberties violations, to take place, in the name of politics, cronyism, quid pro quo relationships, for political, personal and/or financial interests...... including by Moor's former family law division, rogue crony judge and lawyer, buddies.


-- Also in my opinion, these glaring miscarriages of justice, have taken place, because of (Moor's/ Division 5's) participation, in allowing themselves, my violent ex. -his rogue lawyers' and judges, that they are in bed with, to willfully, negligently, recklessly, maliciously, violate my constitutional rights, in glaring civil liberties and constitutional violations, while harming, bullying, demeaning, victim blaming; a disabled, vulnerable private citizen and documented, abuse victim, victim of horrific crimes of violence, by my violent ex-who has been protected and never held to account. .....

.....Moor and Division 5, also violated my ADA rights', HIPAA rights', victims rights', civil liberties-- among many other things -while empowering and enabling, my violent, abusive ex., emboldening his abuse, lawlessness , predicate acts; while emboldening, the malfeasance, abuse of positions and power, predicate acts--of my. violent ex, his rogue lawyers and judges they are in bed with-- in all of their lawlessness, abuse of power and of positions-including, misprisions of felonies -while turning a blind eye, to significant abuse, crimes of violence and other numerous predicate acts.

......The word "constitution" should never come out of the mouth of Moor, Division 5, -CJ, Laurence Rubin, along with Moor's cowardly associates, -- associate justices Lamar Baker and Dorothy Kim -, because their words.\ring hollow and empty--while their actions, cronyism, miscarriages of justice, suppression, of facts evidence.....lead to and are cause of civil liberties' suppression, violatiion the constitution, state interests, uniformity in decisions, violation of public trust and cowardly "unpublished" outrageous, misogynistic, sexist, anti -female, filled w, gender animus, unconstitutional, opinions.

..Let's NOT forget--ABC was the single media outlet , who had the Ba**s to provide coverage of #SELMAmarch

“We must never ever give up, we must never ever give in...” -John Lewis -


I CAN'T BREATHE"......-- " I COULDN'T BREATHE" "-How many times -How many pleas?

There must be justice, accountability, for wrongdoers..JUSTICE and reparations for their victims.

#RESTin POWERJohnLEWIS

.....#BLOODySunday


....#POWERofOurVOICES&MEDIA

Litigant

Comment #: CA31390
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
---How many times should I have had to make pleas for help, due process --- protections from my abusive, violent ex. saying, "he's lying under oath, his lawyers are lying, about material facts, under oath.."-- How many times must I plea---"I CAN'T BREATHE"......-- " I COULDN'T BREATHE" " -How many times -How many pleas?

....How many times, should I have had to say, 'he strangled me, until I lost my breath and ..he punched me-closed fist--he pounded and thrashed my head.... How many pleas...for help, due process and justice--?


----John Lewis, was beaten, also had his skull bashed --bashed. His skull was w/ a Billy Club, while on Selma Bridge fighting against oppression, equality, justice and the right to vote......

--George Floyd was also choked and strangled-and cried out-"I CAN'T BREATHE....."......

.....This is NOT --"he said-she said"-- my violent ex. repeatedly lied and victim blamed me-denying the abuse--under oath--until he was tangled up-and then admitted to the abuse and physical assaults (-victim blaming me ( he didn't seem worried about Mail and Wire Fraud, Crimes of Violence, Perjury., other Predicate Crimes and Title 18 violations)- etc.-while nsexist, misoginystic, Moor--Divison 5 protected this violent male, Moor's family law cronies, and victim blamed, humiliated, demeaned me, the disabled, unrepresented, female victim-of horrific abuse and violence.

Other

Comment #: CA31305
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
CA31304

^*travesties of justice,

.........What does administrative presiding justice, Elwood G. Lui think??-… What does Chief Justice, Laurence Rubin, Division 5, think??? Obviously--allowing these glaring travesties of justice, to take place...

Other

Comment #: CA31266
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
@31256

"Carl Moor and his associates Lamar Baker--Dorthy Kim-Division 5 ARE the pandemic of systemic injustices, inequalities...constitutional civil liberties violations, .....sexism, misogyny, cronyism, female gender animus--....victim blaming female victims of documented domestic violence--...while protecting Moor's rogue, family law judge and (lawyer cronies and their well funded, violent perjuring, money laundering, male clients-)... "

^ Justice Carl Moor, was just as inept, ineffective and rogue, when adjudicating family law cases; while engaging in cronyism, sexism and quite improper conduct. Now he is just protecting his own, in all of their malfeasance.

Justice Carl Moor, routinely violates the constitution and civil liberties, of those who appear in front of him, for oral argument, if they are not part of his agenda or clique; especially females, the unrepresented and marginalized.

Justice Carl Moor, is also clueless to facts, evidence and significant information, in the Briefs. It appears, that Division 5, is seriously undermining the constitution, civil liberties, precedent, the rule of law and that Acting CJ Lamar Baker, has bitten off way more than he could chew, while cowardly, caving to politics.

Litigant

Comment #: CA31256
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Carl Moor and his associates Lamar Baker--Dorthy Kim-Division 5 ARE the pandemic of systemic injustices, inequalitiesconstitutional civil liberties violations, sexism, misogyny, cronyism, female gender animus--victim blaming female victims of documeted domestic violence--while protecting Moor's rogue, family law judge and (lawyer cronies and their well funded, violent perjuring, money laundering, male clients-)

Litigant

Comment #: CA31140
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Comment #: CA31075

*NOT

^ " In my opinion,the fact that Acting Chief Justice, Lamar Baker, would *NOT even place his signature, to allow the Opinion, to be Published, on a recent outrageous, sexist, biased Opinion, authored by Justice Carl
Moor, (where they appeared to have created new outrageous , malicious laws and precedent) is an example, of one of the many reasons, why the laete, Chief Justice Paul Turner, was very skeptical, about Justice Lamar Baker's appointment, to the Court of Appeal.

--An Opinion, which Justice Moor authored, in which Justice Baker concurred, displayed flagrant gender animus, victim blaming a female victim of documented Domestic Violence, with stunning over-reach, to protect the perpetrator of the domestic violence, and is very likely, one of the many reasons, of the late, Chief Justice Paul Turner, skepticism , relating to Justice Lamar Baker's appointment, to the Court of Appeal.

I actually had more hope for acting CJ Lamar Baker, because he worked for Obama, was young-- and he himself (although only slightly) was discredited by some, as have exaggerated his resume, relating to his time in DC. Baker seems to have shamefully caved to politics and this puts his leadership skills into question, because he looks weak, seems to lack convictions, seems to ignore the constitution and guaranteed equity, civil liberties, fairness in hearings ...."

Litigant

Comment #: CA31075
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
#: CA31074

^ In my opinion,the fact that Acting Chief Justice, Lamar Baker, would even place his signature, to allow the Opinion, to be Published, on a recent outrageous, sexist, biased Opinion, authored by Justice Carl Moor, (where they appeared to have created new outrageous , malicious laws ans precedent) is an example, of one of the many reasons, why the laete, Chief Justice Paul Turner, was very skeptical, about Justice Lamar Baker's appointment, to the Court of Appeal.

--An Opinion, which Justice Moor authored, in which Justice Baker concurred, displayed flagrant gender animus, victim blaming a female victim of documented Domestic Violence, with stunning over-reach, to protect the perpetrator of the domestic violence, and is very likely, one of the many reasons, of the late, Chief Justice Paul Turner, skepticism , relating to Justice Lamar Baker's appointment, to the Court of Appeal.

--I actually had more hope for acting CJ Lamar Baker, because he worked for Obama, was young-- and he himself (although only slightly) was discredited by some, as have exaggerated his resume, relating to his time in DC. Baker seems to have shamefully caved to politics and this puts his leadership skills into question, because he looks weak, seems to lack convictions, seems to ignore the constitution and guaranteed equity, civil liberties, fairness in hearingsand appears compromised..

--Carl Moor, on the other hand, is known some, toi be a political hack, who still acts if he is a family law judge and can't handle the responsibility (and lack ethics /knowlege to have a seat on the Court of Appeal)-he is also known for his sexism, to be incredibly inept, compromised. for engaging in cronyism, for having small male syndrome, while completely ignoring civil liberties and the constitution, in order to protect his equally compromised, family law cronies.

Litigant

Comment #: CA31074
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
CA31065, 31071 -On point! On freaking point!!

Litigant

Comment #: CA31024
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
-- The Opinion, is beyond unconscionable and outrageous, while acting CJ Lamar Baker, should be ashamed of himself, for his concurrence, cowardice, failure to speak up, and well as, ass. justice, Dorothy Kim, who should also be ashamed of herself and cowardice. .

--Cowardly, compromised, Division 5, obviously played politics, over justice, over civil liberties, while blatantly disregarding the constitution, state and public interests, federal preemption and uniformity in decisions.

Other

Comment #: CA30982
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
--Appellate "justice" Carl Moor -former family law judges (still acting like one -while protecting corrupt family law judges and lawyers) --is a sexist, misogynist, who blatantly creates a false Opinion, contrary to solid evidence -while assassinating the character of female , documented abuse victims, female self-represented abuse victim, while going out of his way to protect, the documented violent male and his corrupt, perjuring connected lawyers.


--Division 5, 2nd District Court of Appeal, Acting CJ -Lamar Baker, ass. "justice" Carl Moor, and Dorothy Kim, victim blame and assassinate the character, demean, degrade, documented abuse victims, ignore the constitution, evidence , facts, civil liberties, uniformity in decisions, state interests, in order to play politics and help protect equally corrupt family law cronies, of Carl Moor.


----Carl Moor seems like he is a very insecure male, who has an axe to grind with females, while going out of his way to protect documented male abusers, Shame on Lamar Baker and Dorothy Kim , for playing along and playing dirty.

__Guarantee these equally miscreant, family law bozo cronies, are not worth the Appellate Courts, loss of credibility, reputation and taint on their obvious Opinions , while ignoring constitutional mandates, uniformity in decisions and public/state interests.

Other

Comment #: CA30682
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
@ 30679

I stand against, these strong appearance's, of social injustices, acts of misogyny, discriminatory practices and civil liberties violations, perpetrated by 2nd District, Court of Appeal, Division Five, while depriving this citizen, of rights, secured to her, by the U.S. Constitution.


I stand against, these strong appearance's, perpetrated by 2nd District, Court of Appeal, Division Five, to intentionally injure, oppress, intimidate, this citizen, in the free exercise, enjoyment, of rights and privileges, secured to her, by the Constitution and laws of the United States.


I stand against, these strong appearance's, perpetrated by 2nd District, Court of Appeal, Division Five, while acting outside the bounds and limits, of their lawful authority, willfully depriving and causing this litigant, her rights, privileges and immunities, secured and protected, by the Constitution and laws of United States.

Litigant

Comment #: CA30635
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
CA30634

All of this came out--I have been forced to re-live trauma and horror- because Divison 5-Lamar Baker , Carl Moor, Dorthy Kim, and the family courts, Lawrence Riff, Christine Byrd, Trent Lewis, FAILED TO ACT -or protect my cobnstitutional civil liberties and rule of law----and because my ex and his attorneys, including Richard Gould-Saltman, acted in incredibly bad faith and lawlessness....

---This case should have been setlled years ago---but when a slime family lawyer can run to his slime family law judge wife for help--this is what happens -and there is no motivation for them to settle-- when it is easier for them to violate laws, ethics, as they finacially benefit , from dirty money.

Other

Comment #: CA30633
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Grand jury indicts violent , male, boyfriend,Jeffrey Beier for murder of girlfriend Charlene Voight, who went missing from Littleton, Colorado in 2016, who allegedly committed previous acts of domestic violence .

Litigant

Comment #: CA30495
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
30494

So many have expressed similiar disgust and shock, at the abusive, horrific conduct of the violent perp. and by conduct by very bad actors and public servants.

Other

Comment #: CA30484
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
@ 30483

Divison 5 must take a long, hard look at themselves -is this the way they want to be seen?

They betrayed public trust, the constitution, the rule of law and this is what has ensued.

Beside lack of leadership, how could they get it so very wrong and get to this inexcusable place?

Other

Comment #: CA30483
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
--There must be swift justice and accountability, no matter who you may be-or think you may be.

----Intolerable, unacceptable conduct, fraught with wrongdoings, abuse and disparities, by public officials, public servants and court officers, must never be tolerated.

-- Sexiist, Misogynistic, Conflicted, "Justices" Carl Moor, Dorothy Kim and acting Chief "Justice" Lamar Baker, and their corrupt family law buddies, who they protect , are the one who deteriorate civil law and order, public trust and and the constitution.

---The lawless behavior and/or criminal activity, harm to public and public safety, state interests, plaguing the Court of Appeal , Second District, Division 5, by Carl Moor,, Dorothy Kim and acting Chief "Justice" Lamar Baker; is much worse , than any lawless activity and looting, taking place in Minnesota.

---The system is broken against private citizens, females and those of color; but Divisiion 5 and family law cronies, shamefully take/do what ever they want, which will benefit themselves and cronies.

Other

Comment #: CA30454
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
@30449

For many survivors of intimate partner violence and sexual assault, most often afflicting women, the harrowing prospect of recounting and reliving, the gut-wrenching, details of the unspeakable trauma and tortourous violence, which she endured, at the hands of her intimate partner, causes additional trauma, torment, with added, extremely overwhelming, distress and pain.

It seems, from what appears to be very credible information, provided in the comment, that this self-represented litigant, had to endure appalling, unspeakable acts of abuse at the hands of her intimate partner, as well as, the judicial system.


It also appears, that there was an intentional, willful violation of her federal civil rights, organized and orchestrated, with the abetment of state actors, such as, justices and judges, who knew better. They knew exactly what they were doing and can't plead ignorance.

The justice system, became the nexus and hindrance, to this survivor's financial security, access to victims services and her long-term safety; with their complicity in the continuation, of the cycle of domestic violence and abuse, including financial.


This survivor has also forced, to be entangled in prolonged litigation, with her abuser, with additional appalling abuse, including economic, psychological and litigation abuse, while being forced to tell her story over and over, which is not by any means, easy.

Almost all domestic violence cases, include devastating economic abuse; which often includes survivors being forced to finance their own abuse; while often left footing, the bill for fraudulent debt, medical and dental bills, property damage, counseling or therapy, loss of property, loss of a vehicle , damaged credit, loss of employment, permanent disability, pain and suffering, among other things, while damaged credit, affects so many different aspects of their life, including housing and employability.

That’s why many abusers will control finances, in order restrict a survivor’s ability to earn a living or intentionally ruin their credit, making it next-to-impossible for a survivor to become financially independent and consequently, able to survive on their own.

There must be restitution, for victims of intimate partner violence and sexual assault, by the perpetrator, who has caused her grave harm and trauma, quite often serious enough to warrant criminal charges, while seeking seek criminal restitution. Other compensation options may include a civil tort.

Some good news for many survivors, since the majority of domestic violence, sexual assault, cases never see the inside of a courtroom, there is often a significant settlement in these type of cases.

Obviously and astonishingly, this did not happen in this case; while there appears to be very serious, questionable conduct, appearence's of impropriety and wrongdoings, by court officers, while substantial accountability and restitution, are necessessary, in order for justice to be finally served.

Litigant

Comment #: CA30071
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
30070

What the fudge? I hope the FBI puts them all in prison, where they play with their crayons and coloring books.

Litigant

Comment #: CA29684
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
--Appellate court 2nd district Court odf Appeal--'justices" Carl Moor (former family law judge) and Division 5 ('acting' Chief 'justice" Lamar baker, D. Kim) --all lost all credibility and arguably violated state, federal pre-emption laws, the constitution , to protect lower court, corrupt family law judge/lawyer cronies, when my civil liberties were violated.


--- I was victim blamed, mocked, by Carl Moo'r sexist, mispgynistic, Opinion -which contradicted the facts, violations of law, material misrepresentations, by my ex., his attorneys', judges they are in bed wo]ith[--- despite serious evidence, despite of my ex's abuse, perjury, money laundering , mail fraud--while harming the state'sand public interests'-while there always should be uniformity in the law-and there was not in this case. --Then they want me to finance ,my own abuse-and pay my abuser's fee's (based on fraud and fraudulent testimony/record of my ex. and his agents--his aytorneys' (even after my ex' s admissions--and my evidence--highlighted their fraud). ----If they think their lawlessness, retaliation and $1900.00 in fees' will get rid of me, ounish me-for telling the truth----- it just did quite the opposite--and my ex's attorneys' are his agents--they all know they submitted a fraudulent record--and now they want to extort me( control me) harm me more-- based on fraud?

---The remedies-should have just skyrocketed. I guess these narcissist, train wrecks have not learned-train wrecks always make the front page.

--I guarantee, my violent ex. the Gould-Saltmans' and Mary catherine Bohen, are NOT worth it--- and people are talking..(.it "ain't" pretty)-and neither ae corruot judges, public servants, lawyers, "criminals of the court"

Litigant

Comment #: CA29683
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
---Appellate court 2nd district Court odf Appeal--'justices" Carl Moor (former family law judge) and Division 5 ('acting' Chief 'justice" Lamar baker, D. Kim) --all lost all credibility and arguably violated state, federal pre-emption laws, the constitution , to protect lower court, corrupt family law judge/lawyer cronies, when my civil liberties were violated.


--- I was victim blamed, mocked, by Carl Moo'r sexist, mispgynistic, Opinion -which contradicted the facts, violations of law, material misrepresentations, by my ex., his attorneys', judges they are in bed wo]ith[--- despite serious evidence, despite of my ex's abuse, perjury, money laundering , mail fraud--while harming the state'sand public interests'-while there always should be uniformity in the law-and there was not in this case.

--Then they want me to finance ,my own abuse-and pay my abuser's fee's (based on fraud and fraudulent testimony/record of my ex. and his agents--his aytorneys' (even after my ex' s admissions--and my evidence--highlighted their fraud).

----If they think their lawlessness, retaliation and $1900.00 in fees' will get rid of me, ounish me-for telling the truth----- it just did quite the opposite--and my ex's attorneys' are his agents--they all know they submitted a fraudulent record--and now they want to extort me( control me) harm me more-- based on fraud?

---The remedies-should have just skyrocketed. I guess these narcissist, train wrecks have not learned-train wrecks always make the front page.

Other

Comment #: CA29655
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
#: CA29469


" They're all such, corrupt, sleazy, scumbags; Justice Carl Moor and his circle of cronies. Justice Carl Moor, appears to have small male complex and does not seem to be able to handle himself, with intelligent, confident, female pro pers, who have the fact, merits, law and evidence, on their side.

---Justice Carl Moor also appears to be incredibly incompetent, sexist, easly corruptible, amateirish judge and public servant, who will go out of his way in all ofway to engage in cronyism, for his equally corrupt attorney and judge buddies, in the family courts; while also engaging in corruption, cover-ups and over-reach to discredit their foes even when the evidence and merits are on their side; while going as far as, protecting violent males, who have perpetrated horrific acts of intimate partner violence, corrupt judges and attorneys, despite the harm to the victim, citizens and state interests. Divsion 5 -Court of Appeal, 2nd District, Acting Chief Justice Lamar Baker and Justice Dorthy Kim, should be ashamed of themselves, for going along with Justice Moor's corruptiblity, ineptitude and sleaziness, while being equally complicit. "

Other

Comment #: CA29654
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
----"Federal District Court Minute Order Summary -I WAS PLAINTIFF my ex was a Defendant.: ---(Beside the fact that my ex. hired a 800.00/hr attorney, friend of the Gould-Saltmans'--who also submitted--all of my the falsities , of my ex.and his agents, attorneys' including, Richard Gould-Saltman , into the federal record as Judicial Notice.) -

--1.) As to the Life Insurance / [my ex's] Breach of Contract (divorce Decree and Judgement): the federal court opined: .......(a) "......and also required Defendant [my ex} to maintain [me] Plaintiff as the primary beneficiary of his life insurance policy, with Plaintiff having the right to confirm, on a continuing basis, his compliance. ...

.......(b) ".....Accordingly, any of Plaintiff’s [my ] claims related to either the breach or enforcement of provisions of the Divorce Decree are dismissed ........without prejudice to Plaintiff reasserting such claims in state (family) court." ...........2.) As to [my ex's] FRAUD: (the federal court opined) ".......The Court therefore dismisses Plaintiff’s Ninth claim for Fraud ........without prejudice to Plaintiff [me] moving, in state (family)court, to ***VACATE DIVORCE DECREE or ORDERS which denied Plaintiff’s [my] petitions for modification of spousal support, based on [his--my ex's] FRAUD."

----Minute Order- Central District Court) (3.) As to the SANCTIONS against my ex. : --the federal district court opined: "..... Plaintiff’s [my] request for sanctions on this basis........ is denied without prejudice to Plaintiff [me ] reasserting it in state (family) court."....... -----


.....^^I did all of this--while Lawrence Riff, Appeallate Justice Carl Moor , Divison 5, including Lamar baker--continued to cover for my documented, violent ex. and victim blame me. ----Sexist, Victim Blaming---Carl Moor and Appellate Court---Division 5 (appearing to be covering, inferior court--corrupt family court cronies -- for Lawrence RIFF, Trent Lewis, the Gould-Saltmans' my violent ex. and his corrupt lawyers--Mary Catherine Bohhen and Richard GOULD-SALTMAN) : ---Appellate Court -Division 5 (contradicting even former Appellate Court Opinion) ---Carl Moor, Lamar Baker Division 5, --"The court noted that [her] litigation of claims in Federal Court that were obviously time barred was plainly meritless, ....


^^.." I reached out to thiese public servants for help, after all the horific domestic violence--and even after my ex. finally admitted after years of perjury, mail fraud...etc (after I brought in a witness) Carl Moor, Lamar Baker and Divison 5, called the domestic violence, "Bare assertions and rambling accusations") Appearences alone--- Corrupt and "on the take, "much? -

---Appellate Court '"justices"--CARL MOOR , "acting' chief "justice"LAMAR BAKER -Divison 5----[Her] testimony regarding present time, her testimony was vague, conclusory, and lacked in the specifics...[his] perception that he had been victimized by [her] had merit. SERIOUSLY?

---- Corrupt Sexist and Victim Blame Much? Nothing vague about domestic violence abuse, perjury and later admissions--while casusing great harm to me--the victim...

....**I guarantee,the corruption and ineptitude, of THE GOULD-SALTMANS' Larwence Riff, TRENT LEWIS, C. BYRD, my ex. his attorneys, Mary Catherine BOHEN...and Richard GOULD-SALTMAN, are NOT worth all the crimes committed by somany, hamrm to me, the public and the judiciary-

...None of these miscreants are worth it--loss of reputation, credibility, standing....prison.....all the grave harm caused --add homelessness is bad enough, add COVID-19, add corrupt judges and lawyers, with standards lowered to those of 2 bit criminal thugs---all cozy in their mansions--would not last for one second , the position in which they plsced the most vulnerable in society..."

Other

Comment #: CA12556
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judges totally incompetent and spineless. His rush to judgment with all the evidence in hindsight totally ignored it and did not have the balls to undermine the mediator decision. Be told me put my kids in danger when he himself heard the testimony of my kid's mom marrying a violent individual and he still Had the balls to say it was in good faith. Why don't you have your kids go live with a violent individual.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA11940
Rating:10.0
Comments:
The best judge I have ever appeared in front of.

Other

Comment #: CA10592
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Hon. Carl H Moor needs to be removed from the bench! He allowed automatic restraining orders to be broken. Because he was "overwhelmed" and there was too many numbers for him to wrap his head around, he cost me $289k in my divorce settlement. My ex and his parents put over $400k in liens on the community property, after separation, he did nithing about it.

Litigant

Comment #: CA10509
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Horrible Judge....Denied me from presenting facts of law when it was visibly present in my case. Their was Contempt, Forgery, Fraud, Perjury, Conspiracy. Judge Moor denied a valid 170.6 motion. Denied a motion filed by ex wife to quash a restraining order. This Judge should be in jail for his Fraud Upon The Court....