Hon. Carl H Moor See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Los Angeles County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   10.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 3 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Carl H Moor


Comments


Other

Comment #: CA27652
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
27648
--Reasonable people are stunned, shocked beyond belief, that Justice Carl Moor, would author, such sexiest, biased, victim blaming, violent perpetrator protecting Opinion; as he did in my case.

--Reasonable people are also stunned, shocked that Acting Chief Justice, Lamar Baker, would even sign his name, to such an Outrageous, malicious, anti-female, Opinion, where so many constitutional, ethical and due process violations, had taken place, in the inferior family courts.

^They're such a disgrace to the judiciary.

Justice Moor should have at least, attempted to act, as if he held himself to a higher standard, than his low standard family court buddies. Instead, he lowered to the low standards he held himself to from his family law days, he displayed disrespect to the constitution, the law, to females and more importantly, disrespected and displayed lack of judicial decorum, to a pro per, women and victim of abuse; while denying her of her right to a fair trial, right to be treated equally and with respect, while denying her right to due process.

Justice Moor does not belong on any bench.
Acting Justice , Justice Lamar Baker, should be ashamed for signing his name to such slanted, biased, Opinion and Travesty of Justice. Justice Moor, Justice Baker and the other justice, who signed their name to such a slanted, sexist, uncivil, Opinion, make the Appellate Court as a whole, look like a terrible, biased, constitutional crisis and mess.

Other

Comment #: CA27651
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
27648

--Reasonable people are stunned, shocked beyond belief, that Justice Carl Moor, would author, such sexiest, biased, victim blaming, violent perpetrator protecting Opinion; as he did in my case.

---Reasonable people are also stunned, shocked that Acting Chief Justice, Lamar Baker, would even sign his name, to such an Outrageous, malicious, anti-female, Opinion, where so many constitutional, ethical and due process violations, had taken
place, in the inferior family courts.

^They're such a disgrace to the judiciary.

Justice Moor should have at least, attempted to act, as if he held himself to a higher standard, than his low standard family court buddies. Instead, he lowered to the low standards he held himeslf to from his family law days, he displayed disrespect to the constitution, the law, to females and more importantly, disrespected and displayed lack of judicial decorum, to a pro per, women and victim of abuse; while denying her of her right to a fair trial, right to be treated equally and with respect, while denying her right to due process.

Justice Moor does not belong on any bench.

Acting Justice , Justice Lamar Baker, should be ashamed for signing his name to such slanted, biased, Opinion and Travesty of Justice. Justice Moor, Justice Baker and the other justice, who sin=gned their name to such a slanted, sexist, uncivil, Opinion, make the Appellate Court as a whole, look like a terrible, biased, constitutional crisis and mess.

Litigant

Comment #: CA27648
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
--Reasonable people are stunned, shocked beyond belief, that Justice Carl Moor, would author, such sexiest, biased, victim blaming, violent perpetrator protecting Opinion; as he did in my case.

---Reasonable people are also stunned, shocked that Acting Chief Justice, Lamar Baker, would even sign his name, to such an Outrageous, malicious, anti-female, Opinion, where so many constitutional, ethical and due process violations, had taken
place, in the inferior family courts.

Litigant

Comment #: CA27647
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Reasonable people are stunned, shocked beyond belief, that Justice Carl Moor, would author, such sexiest, biased, victim blaming, violentperpetrator protecting Opinion; as he did in my case.

Reasonable people are also stunned, shocked that Acting Chief Justice, Lamar Baker, would even sign his name, to such an Outrageous, malicious, anti-female, Opinion, where so many constitutiona, ethical and due process violations, had taken place, in the inferior family courts.

Litigant

Comment #: CA27641
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
--Appellate Justice Carl Moor, does not seem to like women, the way he outrageously re-defined definition of domestic violence, when engaging in over-reach to make exccuses for my documeted abuser; while protecting his {Moor's] inferior court rogue family crony judges and lawyers.

--I was self-represented, my abuser highly represented , While Justice carl Moor, very improperly engaged in over-reach, while commenting on my appearence, the way I spoke, my work product--as I was going against my abuser, self represented...

----Justice Moor also repeatedly contradicted himself, the record--

----- For ex. while I am fully disabled--he stated I "could get a job"--after he repeatedly trashed my work product and the way I spoke..along with this male judge. commenting on my a self-represented female, domestic violence victim's appearance . Seriously?

Justice Carl Moor and some of his his cronies, such, just don't seem to like women......evidenced by their misogyny, sexism, words, rulings, language in Opinion ...

Justice Moor has very eyebrow-raising views domestic violence crimes and accountability (orlackthereof) while appearing to collectively assault ,us all by defiling our Constitution. That should have every one of us.


-----NBC.com:Jan. 23, 2020, 9:30 AM NBC.com By Frank Figliuzzi and Karen Schwartz


---- "...Trump impeachment defense lawyers Ken Starr and Alan Dershowitz share disturbing problem While the president still stands accused of sexual misconduct by more than 20 women, two of his lawyers are embroiled in their own sexual misconduct and assault scandals."...."These guys really don't like women...."

..."While the president still stands accused of sexual misconduct by more than 20 women, two of his lawyers are embroiled in their own sexual misconduct and assault scandals..."


......."There's been a lot of talk about President Donald Trump's choice of Alan Dershowitz and Ken Starr as lawyers participating in his Senate impeachment trial defense...."

......"Most of this has rightly focused on the arguments both men presented at President Bill Clinton's impeachment in 1999, which stand in almost laughable contradiction to the arguments they now seek to present.".

....... " But when these two hired guns are examined alongside their latest famous client, another more troubling thread emerges, one that has been all too common for those in Trump's orbit. These guys really don't like women..."

.......... ".....While the president still stands accused of sexual misconduct, including rape, by more than 20 women, both of these lawyers are deeply embroiled in their own sexual misconduct and assault scandals..". "You don’t have to go back very far to find skeletons in this legal odd couple’s closets. You don't have to go back very far to find skeletons in this legal odd couple's closets.... "

Other

Comment #: CA12556
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judges totally incompetent and spineless. His rush to judgment with all the evidence in hindsight totally ignored it and did not have the balls to undermine the mediator decision. Be told me put my kids in danger when he himself heard the testimony of my kid's mom marrying a violent individual and he still Had the balls to say it was in good faith. Why don't you have your kids go live with a violent individual.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA11940
Rating:10.0
Comments:
The best judge I have ever appeared in front of.

Other

Comment #: CA10592
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Hon. Carl H Moor needs to be removed from the bench! He allowed automatic restraining orders to be broken. Because he was "overwhelmed" and there was too many numbers for him to wrap his head around, he cost me $289k in my divorce settlement. My ex and his parents put over $400k in liens on the community property, after separation, he did nithing about it.

Litigant

Comment #: CA10509
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Horrible Judge....Denied me from presenting facts of law when it was visibly present in my case. Their was Contempt, Forgery, Fraud, Perjury, Conspiracy. Judge Moor denied a valid 170.6 motion. Denied a motion filed by ex wife to quash a restraining order. This Judge should be in jail for his Fraud Upon The Court....