Hon. Armen Tamzarian See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Los Angeles County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   6.4 - 8 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   8.0 - 11 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Armen Tamzarian


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA48791
Rating:3.9
Comments:
He doesn't understand basic real estate law and is VERY arrogant, which amounts to a judge that is wrong many times on straightforward issues but won't change his incorrect opinions. You'll need to be patient with him and teach him the law as if he is a student. Quite sad for a Superior Court Judge. I believe he is dangerous due to his lack of basic knowledge, which causes parties to spend unnecessary funds drafting motion after motion and attending hearing after hearing to correct his mistakes. I would not allow him to preside over any case that I represent in the future.

This is the first judge that I've left a review for. I felt it necessary because I've been in his courtroom for quite a while now and know him relatively well as a judge.

My review is based on real estate law matters. I have no experience with him otherwise; however, I have observed him argue with counsels in other matters where he advanced clearly incorrect statements of the law regarding basic civil procedure.

This review and rating is an honest assessment and not made out of spite or anger. Beware.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA47351
Rating:2.7
Comments:
Arrogant, unprepared, and ignorant of the law. Admitted that he did not understand basic concepts of real property law, but did not bother to do any research. Makes up his mind without an understanding of the law.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA46346
Rating:1.8
Comments:
Arrogant beyond belief, condescending, patronizing; was wrong about so much of the law but does not bother to question his wrong opinions. Literally got an order completely wrong that cost me thousands. A joke of a judge and person.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA27874
Rating:9.6
Comments:
First his courtroom is very friendly. He tries to keep decorum, but is not overbearing and he is personable. Secondly, if he does not know an answer to a legal question he will take the time and effort to go into his chambers and do research until he comes up with the answer. He showed absolutely no bias to one side or the other. Would take him in every trial I ever have in the future and although represented the defense in this case am also an active plaintiff's attorney and would take him on a plaintiff's case.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA24366
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Recently tried a case in front of this judge and found him to be extremely conscientious and was all around excellent in his rulings and how he handled the courtroom. He was knowledgeable about the law, read the cases and actually had them in front of him while arguing motions in limine. Throughout trial, his rulings were well reasoned and correct even though I was on the wrong side of some of them. One of the best judges in LA County. If you get him, hold on to him because he is a good one. I would try every case I had in front of this judge.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA19990
Rating:9.8
Comments:
Very reasonable, good temperament, knowledgeable, even handed, and efficient.

Other

Comment #: CA19061
Rating:10.0
Comments:
I had the opportunity to sit in Judge Tamzarian's courtroom observing several cases. I was very impressed with his compassion. He was very patient and gave everyone a chance to say everything they needed to say. He explained rules & definitions clearly to those without an attorney. He took time to make sure everyone understood his orders and why he made the decision he did.

Litigant

Comment #: CA13087
Rating:2.0
Comments:
This judge would probably be a great mediator, but doesn't seem to have sufficient knowledge or experience to adjudicate family law matters. Loves to talk. More interested in doing what he believes is fair instead of what the law requires. Doesn't understand parental alienation. Probably rules from instructions of the Supervising Judge. Will always 170.6 him from now on.
View Detail

Litigant

Comment #: CA12193
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Biased. As the petitioner with insurmountable amounts of proof and exhibits. The court did not review all. Let Respondent be heard and believed without any burden of proof. This judge is dangerous and is not looking to protect children.

Other

Comment #: CA11474
Rating:5.0
Comments:
I've been following the Lexi & Ruby Dillon case. There are too many cases getting lost within the OC system and it's failed processes, mine included. Judge Tamzarian, thank you for being so thorough and mindful of all your work. Your Honor, I am praying for you, and for the best possible outcome for all the parties involved.

Litigant

Comment #: CA11470
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I have been a family law litigant for over 9 years. It is refreshing to see a family law Judge be lawful and have the best interest of the children top priority in their courtroom. I have been following Lexi and Ruby's case since the beginning. Happy Lexi is coming home! Time for healing!

Other

Comment #: CA11468
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Dear honorable judge Armen Tamzarian,
We are all admiring your righteousness in dealing with the case of Lexi and her mother Ruby Dillon.
Thank you for being fair-minded and bringing Lexi to her mother.
John Cate is an evil individual and dose not have the interest of the innocent child Lexi in his mind.
we expectant eyes we are fallowing this case and we are confident that you will render Ruby victorious in getting her beloved daughter back in her loving embrace.
Thank you abundantly your honor

Other

Comment #: CA11463
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I see so many crimes in the news, 2 years for rape, 7 years for manslaughter, gee I even had a friend sentenced to LIFE and she got out in 12 years! Thank-you for upholding the law in Orange County's family court system. Hopefully it will allow my friend, who did nothing other than file for divorce, to see her child. It has been years of alienation and now you're giving her a chance. Thanks Honorable Armen!
Elizabeth Freebird

Other

Comment #: CA11461
Rating:10.0
Comments:
I have been monitoring this case from the beginning. It's refreshing to finally see a judge following the law. It has been far too long Lexi Dillon hasn't been allowed to see or speak to her Mother. John Cate should not be involved in any case. His interests are NOT in the well being of any child or family.

Other

Comment #: CA11460
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Thank You For taking Ruby Dillon's case in a serious manner. John Cate should not be involve in this case neither should represent any minor. He represented my children and he side their dad to the point that he told me " if you don't accept all the terms that dad wants your children are going to end up in a foster home" . John Cate needs to be out of this case. Children need to be protected not harm.

Other

Comment #: CA11459
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Thank you for being a fair and upstanding Judge. I have followed the Lexi case from the start. I feel you are the best judge to now put this case after all these years up front and judged with no bias and rule with the true laws. Thank you again for being a true and fair judge in the state of California.

Other

Comment #: CA11456
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Thank you for supporting Ruby Dillon and her little daughter. Thank you for upholding justice and for being brave.

Other

Comment #: CA11454
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Good things to say about him! Upholds the best interests of children. To many superior court judges do not read the facts placed before them...this one does. That ensures the safety of children.

Other

Comment #: CA11453
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Thank you Judge for observing the law and protecting children. I have been following the Ruby Dillon and Lexi Dillon case closely for years. I commend you for not allowing John Cate to deter you from following the law and being fair. I am hopeful that you will continue to keep John Cate's vendetta out of this case. I truly hope that other judges will take notice of your actions and also be fair and follow the law. Again, thank you your honor.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA11452
Rating:10.0
Comments:
I've been following Lexi's case very closely. It's refreshing to see a judge finally look out for children! I want to thank him for doing the right thing. It's important that we have more judges like him so that our trust in the system is restored and the children are protected. Praying and cannot wait to see Lexi returned to her mother

Other

Comment #: CA11449
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Thank You!!! I have been following Lexi's case and I thank you for making the right rulings that follow the law and protect children. We need more judical officers like you.

Litigant

Comment #: CA10861
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Very thoughtful and thorough judge. He does not tolerate game playing at all - not by the parties and not by attorneys. He is very fair though, and truly makes sure all parties get their day in court. He is very patient with parties who are in pro per. I believe he is truly interested in making decisions which are in the best interest of the children involved.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA8441
Rating:3.9
Comments:
This judge would probably be a great mediator, but doesn't seem to have sufficient knowledge or experience to adjudicate family law matters. Loves to talk. More interested in doing what he believes is fair instead of what the law requires. Will always 170.6 him from now on.