Hon. Carrie McIntyre Panetta See Rating Details
Superior Court
Monterey County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Please type what you see below:


What others have said about Hon. Carrie McIntyre Panetta


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA30230
Biased, incompetent or an insufferable corrupt judge, who makes up law when she doesn't like the legal outcome. She doesnt understand what statutes of limitations and lack of jurisdiction mean. Did not follow facts or law in granting reliefs she was forbidden by law from granting. She rendered declarations or declaratory opinions against law . See LIBRERS v. BLACK (2005) 129 CA 4th 114, 124—“ lack of standing means the court can not rule on merits of the fraud purpose petitions.” She furthered the wrongful, felony acts of certain women, showing bias. She allowed fraudulently acquired, null and void government orders or ID documents stand to subvert justice. No one will challenge her because of her political connections. She is unethical and makes ridiculous, patently absurd determinations with no law or facts to support. For example, after she determined that a man had no standing as a “putative parent” or allowed party to custody requests, in her nonsense , non-binding and prohibited preliminary “statement of decision” she determined that he should be referred to as a man with obligations owed to a person who commited frauds and deceits. Legal chaos and madness ensued.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA13549
Rating:Not Rated
The top judge in Monterey County. Great demeanor. Firm but Fair. Listens to both sides. Always a pleasure to appear in front of her. Treats everyone with decency and dignity. First rate.