Hon. Judith S. Craddick See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Contra Costa County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   3.2 - 4 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 3 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Judith S. Craddick


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: CA7434
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Craddick is a one sided judge. She is only for the defense. She is an evil old woman who makes her own rules. she should not be allowed to judge, since it is a judges job to be fair and impartial, which she is not! She should do us all a favor and retire!!!

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA7168
Rating:1.4
Comments:
This is a Hard Core Republican,
politically well connected Judge. Graduated from a local law school that is not accredited by the ABA. She has a total bias in favor of Defense and particularly Insurance companies. She has been on family law and civil. She does not know the Law. Rules on her own feelings. Worst Worst Worst Judge that you can imagine. Fair Hearing? Impossible. If a Big Law Firm in your opponent, then you better dismiss your case and go home early.

Litigant

Comment #: CA6609
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Spent nearly ten years in CC Courts and many years before Craddick. Allowed my ex to get temporary custody of our children on an Ex Parte hearing that I was not aware of while he was on "supervised visitation". I called in the media after she reversed custody if I agreed to felony ankle bracelets...problem is I have no criminal record and am not a criminal. So many other illegal acts transpired in my case.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA6412
Rating:1.9
Comments:
I'm filing a complaint with the Ca Commission on Judicial Performance. She took an activist role, had Ex Parte communications, violated my constitutional rights. Threatened to throw me in jail if I couldn't convince a third party to take action. When faced with a court reporter she would not come out of chambers and refused to go on record. There's much more. Suffice to say, do not hear a case before her. 239

Other

Comment #: CA3217
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Her quick decision regarding my child custody case was later reversed by my special master. She caused me a lot of heartache and a lot of money. I hear her name around the courts is crazy craddick.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA2481
Rating:1.2
Comments:
Horrible judge for plaintiffs-- wears her defense bias on her sleeve. Granted MSJ against my plaintiff in a negligence case, despite facts and case law clearly militating that the jury decide. Court of Appeal will reverse her shortly. All plaintiffs must 170.6 her.