Hon. Lois Haight See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Contra Costa County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   8.7 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Lois Haight


Comments


Other

Comment #: CA3664
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Absolutely pernicious! Arrogant, rude, permits fabricated and untrue evidences into her courtroom. Allows no due process! Conducts a trial without any true evidence in family courts. Cares nothing about the "trauma" caused when children are removed. Conducts "private" meetings with attorneys before court session. Overall, needs to be investigated by the Judicial Performance Council.

Other

Comment #: CA2618
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Rude and biased. Heartless. She musy be tired of the job amd her judgment is cloudy.children and their familys are no longer important.its just a pay check. justice is no longer the goal.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA2270
Rating:8.7
Comments:
Great judge. Plays fair.