Hon. Barbara Ann Zúñiga See Rating Details
Superior Court
Contra Costa County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   3.3 - 8 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

What others have said about Hon. Barbara Ann Zúñiga


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA5838
Judge Zuniga is one of the most dishonest judges I have ever been privy to watching. She has literally operated a courtroom designed to operate how she chooses. This more often then not is unlawful and disparaging. When this judge favors a party the other better watch out because depending on their abilities will surely loose a good and honest case against straight crooks. My advice to all who been victimized by this judge is to be vocal on the internet, put up a website just to hear and register complaints against her. It may seem useless but after seeing the magnitude of her dishonesty something will form. I urge everyone affected to stand up against this crook who has sent folks to spend their entire lives in a prison while she remains free and able to recommit without fail. May peace be unto you.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA2813
Very nasty. Threw a book at a female DA one time. Likes men better than women. A real piece o work.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA1304
Dishonest, plays favorites. On one case, the judge invented a non-existent document to avoid reversing herself. At last count I found eight published reversals of her decisions by the Court of Appeal.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA1282
Palpable, blatant bias combined with overt hostility to disfavored parties and counsel preclude litigants from a fair trial from this judge. Refuses to rule on admissibility of evidence for days on end during trial.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA591
My experience with her during the past 20+ years has always been positive. She is one of the hardest working judges on the bench, often staying till 9:00 P.M. to get cases settled. Treats SRLs with respect but does not coddle them.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA429
A truly awful judge. Rude, plays favorites, and will intentionally violate the law in her rulings. Not particularly smart, but stubborn. Won't change her mind even if she is proven wrong. Can't imagine that she'd be any better in criminal cases.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA211
Good, smart judge. Punctilious but still has a heart. Prefers male attorneys.