Hon. Carlos A. Cabrera See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Fresno County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   3.4 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Carlos A. Cabrera


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA10797
Rating:2.0
Comments:
He did not control this courtroom. He was a temp sit in judge who was not familiar with a very complicated case. During break I asked the clerk if I could get a postponement to allow for judge Ikeda. She informed judge Cabrera who stated that he was inclined to agree. The Atty kept arguing the fact and 4different times he stated he felt that it should be heard by the other judge and noted that judge Ikeda had obviously spent a lot of time going over the case and had already noted questions he planned on asking. Again the Atty argued and judge Cabrera gave in. A serious injustice was done... but that's just the nature of the beast.... I learned late in life that the only justice in the justice system is,...... INJUSTICE!!

Litigant

Comment #: CA7734
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge is very professional as to his hidden agenda with the other sides attorney Mr hrdlicka if you want to make sure your right to a fair and just trial will be done I would go down the hall as proven during his 6 year terms.

Litigant

Comment #: CA5828
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Horrible. judge does not even bother reading complaint and responses prior to ruling

Litigant

Comment #: CA3676
Rating:1.0
Comments:
He decided the case prior to the hearing. Previously told the opposing parties not to show. I was traveling from NY hoping to present my case. No opportunity to do so. He sarcastically said, "Now you can file your appeal along with Mr Montano's appeal". Mr. Montano was named as a party along with me.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA353
Rating:4.8
Comments:
Not the brightest light in the socket. Appears afraid. He was searching Expedia during one hearing. Could see his monitor.