Hon. Christopher G. Wilson See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Humboldt County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.7 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Christopher G. Wilson


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA2549
Rating:1.7
Comments:
Judge Wilson allows his mood and his tempter to affect his behavior as a judge. He acts very full of himself and often unable to listen to what is really being said in his courtroom. He acts extremely patronizing to defendants, regardless of whether they are in pre-trial hearings or if their case is dismissed. Again, it depends alot on his mood at the moment which seems to determine his words, decisions, and attitude. He has also, in a bad mood, 'cited' law that is fabricated right then and there. He speaks to criminal and civil defendants as if he knows they are guilty or liable, before a case is decided and even after a determination shows differently. On some days and some matters he is reasonable, but one does not know from moment to moment.