Hon. Gregory Wilson Alarcon See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Los Angeles County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   3.7 - 16 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Gregory Wilson Alarcon


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA6033
Rating:1.4
Comments:
The man is a non-starter. I have been a lawyer for more than 40 years, and I have to say that even grumpy judges don't bother me. But, where to these dopes come from? How does a lawyer like this get to be a judge? And who is supplying his PR to this site? Those positive reviews are laughable.

Court Staff

Comment #: CA5599
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Unprofessional conduct is demonstrated by this judge. If this is your judge change, as he has a bad attitude "behind closed doors." Has bad manners and does not care to do his work properly.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA5582
Rating:1.6
Comments:
An utter fool. Thought he was a homo (fag). Never appears to know the subject matter of the matter being presented. Keeps his mouth shut to fool you into thinking that he knows something, when he does not. The tentative decisions appear to be written by a 7th grader. He interrupts litigants/attorneys when they're making the record. He's easily intimidated, and never makes a decision based on rules of procedure and supreme court precedent, in fact, he appears to not want to address the most critical and poignant issues, only seems to address and emphasize issues that are remote. You tell me who this incompetent is.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA5581
Rating:1.9
Comments:
Has a dubious character; acts like he cares, but will rule for the corporation; very poor understanding of procedure; very poor understanding of what the law, procedure means and how applied, and lacks the ability to weigh anything...very rude, interrupts, tampers with the jury, tampers with evidence, and practices law from the bench i.e., meaning he acts as if he is the prosecutor. His evaluation of the case and tentative rulings severely miss the mark...this guy is purely incapable of making a good decision, and INCOMPETENT to the MAX. He should not be re-elected, commissioned. In fact his proposed pension should be terminated and seized, as he appears to have financial interests in big corp.
He does not write up his opinions, orders, or tentatives, he leaves that up to his law clerks who are morons too.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA5551
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
3/2/4 wrote:

"Rating:2.4
Comments:
I held off. Whoever is writing the new and detailed comments certainly has a lot of time to wax positive about a very, very bad judge. Why do non-lawyers get to comment?"

The same person who writes his opinions is probably adding disinformation. Even attys who prevail know he's incompetent. He's some type of Stepford Judge

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA5545
Rating:1.8
Comments:
Utterly incompetent. Allows dull witted clerk to practice law without a license. Mr. 170.6

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA4903
Rating:2.4
Comments:
I held off. Whoever is writing the new and detailed comments certainly has a lot of time to wax positive about a very, very bad judge. Why do non-lawyers get to comment?

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA4902
Rating:8.9
Comments:
Judge Alarcon has great self-control, handles his courtroom in a dignified and even-handed manner, and his rulings on evidence are intelligent and solid. He does not engage in personal attacks on parties or counsel. His consideration of legal issues reflects excellent study, analysis and good judgment. I have found Judge Alarcon's courtroom clerk to be very helpful. She will go out of her way for you, in order to cut through bureaucracy. She is patently impatient with incompetent people -- in particular, bad lawyers.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA4869
Rating:6.9
Comments:
I call this guy a "lawyer's judge." He is a very nice guy, who is flexible almost to a fault. He also is the type of judge where oral argument actually matters, and I have seen him switch rulings from his tentative based on oral argument, so, a hint: prep for it.

His clerk does seem moderately crazy, but she is the type who, if you treat her well, she will treat you well, unless your ex parte is inane and she is saving you time. She basically is the filter to get in front of him, and she takes that job very seriously. She is definitely someone who could take a lesson in "chilling out," but I'm sure that's what he told her to do.

He definitely is not "prompt" or "hardworking," given that he usually took the bench the few times that I appeared in front of him twenty to thirty minutes late. That being said, I would like most of my cases to get assigned to him if I had the choice, given some of the other options in Stanley Mosk.

Other

Comment #: CA4849
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I've never had any issues with this judge, but his clerk is insane. She ridicules all the attorneys in open court, and shouts at them, and orders them to "sit and not move." A group of attorneys had reached out to me to sign a letter months ago regarding this woman, and I had declined because I had not witnessed what they had described. It's now clear. The whole experience in this courtroom is very disturbing.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA4615
Rating:9.6
Comments:
I recently tried a very difficult case in front of Judge Alarcon. My experience makes me very skeptical of the negative reviews. His clerk, Cher Mason, while brisk, runs an efficient courtroom and has the thankless job of controlling what is otherwise the usually very bad behavior of attorneys. Judge Alarcon is a non-interventionist judge who lets you try your case. When you ask him to call balls and strikes he does so, quickly and evenhandedly. He was instrumental in ensuring an efficient trial, and was more than helpful in encouraging what was thought to be an impossible settlement while the jury was deliberating. In my opinion, he did not choose sides and was quite well-versed on the complex legal issues, and literally did research from the bench while we were debating special jury instructions. I hate to say it, but many of the negative comments smell of sour grapes. Sometimes, you deserve to lose. The moral of the story: respect his clerk and know and follow the rules. His courtroom will not tolerate the shenanigans that many lawyers are accustomed to perpetrating.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA4221
Rating:1.3
Comments:
Shortly after filing the lawsuit, an email was forwarded by one of my clients saying that Judge Alarcon had promised the other side that he would soon rule in their favor. When this email was presented to the court, Judge Alarcon had no comment, but his insane clerk did a lot of screaming and hollering. On hearing day, the tentative was apparently organized with an eggbeater, as it was indecipherable legal gibberish, but the conclusion was that when the statute said, "No," it really meant "Yes" -- if that's what the wealthy side wanted it to say. It was clear that the law played absolutely no role in his decision -- the only factor was the clout of the other side, as the early email showed.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA3581
Rating:1.6
Comments:
A horrible judge and not fit to be on the bench. .In more than one occasion, he ruled illegally. Either he does not understand things or he is too lazy to even look at the arguments thus not making any sense when he rules. His clerk, Ms Mason seems to be running the show in his court room and making the critical decisions. A horrible Judge.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA3437
Rating:8.4
Comments:
Very even tempered smart judge. Let's you try your case.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA3008
Rating:3.4
Comments:
If you are on his good side, you luck out.
He seems to care. Frankly, he could care less about the outcome of a case. That is his problem. Because he says nothing, you will think he actually is listening.

Terrible judge to be in front of the jury bc juries believes his Mister Rogers attitude. You get him on your bad side, jury will go that way as well. Even when he is wrong.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA2651
Rating:2.4
Comments:
Doesn't read papers. Just sits and listens to arguments on motions, nodding his head as if he understands what's going on. Research attorney decides motions. Courtroom clerk is rude and domineering.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA2607
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Let's you try your case. Allows you to pick your jury. Don't get on his bad side.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA2419
Rating:2.9
Comments:
Judge was nice to jurors, but SUPER rude to counsel. Never left his chambers and immediately left the bench. He would not talk to his clerk, he would email her. So, when we needed a ruling he would say he had emailed it his his clerk (she was right there), but the attys never rec'd it. Lazy is a good description. Must have gotten to be a judge b/c his dad was one?

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA1092
Rating:2.6
Comments:
No idea how he managed to get on the bench much less stay here. Lazy and intellectually devoid of legal ability.