Hon. Jacqueline A. Connor See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Los Angeles County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   5.3 - 6 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Jacqueline A. Connor


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA3026
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
She was one of the Rampart Judges railroading defendants. She was the judge who covered up for Countrywide's massive mortgage frauds at a time when an economic meltdown could have been averted. In a county where judges are second and third rate, she is at the very bottom. In my opinion, she actually merits a long prison term.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA1707
Rating:1.7
Comments:
Judge Connor appears to have no fear when she commits her crimes. Her ruling in case SC109034 should go down in history. Judge Connor has no regard for the rights of certain litigants and she brazenly makes utterly senseless rulings. She is a scary little monster and I hope I live long enough to see her disgraced and jailed.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA1517
Rating:8.8
Comments:
Excellent trial judge. Efficiently runs her courtroom. Cares deeply about jurors time. Understands complex issues of law and not afraid to hand down adverse rulings.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA1337
Rating:1.0
Comments:
The worst judge. Corrupt.

Court Staff

Comment #: CA1329
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Biased and stupid.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA1316
Rating:3.9
Comments:
Nasty, opinionated and PMSy female judge from hell.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA1208
Rating:7.1
Comments:
Smart and efficient.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA1137
Rating:9.3
Comments:
Gets a little too involved in trials.