Hon. Graciela L. Freixes See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Los Angeles County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   4.5 - 14 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Graciela L. Freixes


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA5620
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
A terror. Makes Hamas look like saints.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA5619
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
A terror. Makes Hamas look like saints.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA5460
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
A disgrace, complete disaster. 170.6 and run as fast a you can. Will destroy your case whether defense or plaintiff. Absolute worse judge anywhere. Should be in custody.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA5109
Rating:2.0
Comments:
The worst judge in the world. No business being a judge. 170.6 required. Completely incompetent.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA4685
Rating:9.9
Comments:
This judge heard a complex MSJ, made proper rulings on evidentiary objections, and gave both sides an opportunity to argue. She gave an explanation for her ruling. I wish that all judges took the time that this judge took to understand the issues and give thought to their rulings.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA4669
Rating:1.1
Comments:
This judge is the worst catastrophe ever to be inflicted upon humanity.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA4567
Rating:1.1
Comments:
This judge is merely an extension of the insurance and defense industries. She is the worst judge in the country, if not the world. She is an absolute defense hack. She comes from the med mal defense industry. She is originally from Communist Cuba, and is stridently anti-Castro. She's a staunch Republican who believes only in big industry and is an extension of big business and defense. She will rule in favor of big business all day long. 170.6 is a must. She is the most unethical judge in the entire country.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA4559
Rating:9.9
Comments:
This judge is fair, conscientious and very polite.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA4553
Rating:1.1
Comments:
This is the worst judge in all of L.A. County, if not the country. She is stridently defense-oriented, regardless of both the facts and the law. 170.6 all day long! (It would be malpractice not to do so.)

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA4269
Rating:9.9
Comments:
At last, a judge who applies the law!

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA4267
Rating:9.9
Comments:
I appeared before Judge Freixes on a rather complicated law and motion matter. It was obvious she had read the moving, opposing and reply briefs and had done her homework. She allowed both sides to present their arguments, then made her ruling, explaining the basis for her decision. Very polite and professional. What a pleasure to appear before a judge who had actually read all the papers.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA4222
Rating:1.5
Comments:
Comes from med mal defense. The absolute worst judge in all of Los Angeles County. Absolute 170.6.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA3059
Rating:1.1
Comments:
one of the worst judges ever appointed..

Other

Comment #: CA3058
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Man-hater. Vicious judge with no mercy. I Petitioned for a case to be expunged that was (misdemeanor) from 1995 and she denied. She is known as the "hanging judge" in the Public defenders words..