Hon. Catherine M Voelker See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Ventura County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.9 - 3 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   10.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Catherine M Voelker


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA52948
Rating:3.7
Comments:
I think she was a diligent deputy district attorney. But legal acumen is sorely lacking.

Litigant

Comment #: CA49569
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
---TRR often immediately deletes credible posts, by LASC family law dept.. litigant victims, on certain, favored, LASC family court, conflicted nepotism nasty judges, but left up this offensive post, that was posted eight times????...And TRR Ed's admitted as much (and so did the creepy, abusive, LASC family court nepotism nasty attorney troll) who *admits, "they're protected, protect each other and protected by LASC family law dept. management, and can do whatever they want" (harm whoever they want-including vulnerable litigant opponents). TRR ED's deleted certain LASC family court judges names and posts and even named certain LASC family court, nepotism nasty abusive judges, (and TRR ED's said they would remove all posts **on a certain **named LASC family court judge.)


____Someone with the same offensive "All CAPS" MO and multiple (exact same postings) same language as "LASC Family court. creepy, abusive, sexual, pervert-predator, nepotism nasty attorney troll"-who posts on various judges and threatening, violent, abusive, (even some sexually assaulting posts against vulnerable litigant opponents who post) and also - (LASC nepotism nasty abusive, family court attorney troll) various counties-to push down credible posts on certain LASC family court judges that the nepotism nasty LA family court, troll is in bed with...

Other

Comment #: CA49370
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Great - kept the trial on schedule and help jurors understand the process. Seemed fair to everyone.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA37702
Rating:1.0
Comments:
What kind of judge disallows cross examination? Is this still America? Why is the Truth so disrespected by this judge?

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA35999
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Judge Voelker cares not for the truth or facts that support alleged charges or citations. She continues to prosecute, willy nilly, from the bench, ignoring the facts in front of her.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA35997
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Voelker's prosecutorial experience controls her. She protects dirty cops perjuring themselves in trial. She gives less than zero credibility to defendants. She's 100% biased and prejudiced. She's 100% unfair and unjust. Her pompous, arrogant demeanor and decisions harm real people and demonstrate despicable abuse of her official power.