Hon. William D. Stewart See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Los Angeles County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   4.7 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. William D. Stewart


Comments


Other

Comment #: CA6180
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Very poor. Fell asleep during the case, didn't listen, took opposing counsel in his chambers to "chat" since it was his friend. Very racist against non whites and people from minority communities. Needs to retire.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA4842
Rating:1.6
Comments:
You've got to be kidding me! This judge granted not one, but three separate ex parte apps for terminating sanctions. He will never engage in argument, because he doesn't know the case or what's written by his clerks in tentatives. If you have a weak case, keep him. He is a nice man, but he should retire.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA3551
Rating:7.8
Comments:
Very nice gentleman, professional, even tempered, and tries to move the case along during trial.