Hon. Carmen Luege See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Orange County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.3 - 3 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 3 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Carmen Luege


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: CA52023
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Carmen Luege is extremely incompetent, bias, and shows extreme favoritism in what strongly appeared to be pre-determined rulings. She also blatantly, ignored the law, facts, substantial evidence, and the merits of the case; beside the fact that my ex. and his lawyer, are pathological liars and no better, than common criminals.

Judge Luege was transferred from the civil division to the Family Law Division 1-1/2 years ago. It is very obvious that she knew very little about family law, knew very little about the case at hand, along with absolute cluelessness, about the facts and evidence, in front of her. None of this seemed to matter, since she had already, strongly appeared, to have made up her mind, before we even entered the courtroom.

The funny thing is she claims to come in on the weekends to read all of her pleadings before hearings. You will find this to be false as she knows absolutely nothing about the parties. In fact, there was a police officer that came in front of her for a divorce, she was admonishing him and did not even know he was a high ranking Sergeant for the Orange County Sheriff's Department.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA51471
Rating:2.0
Comments:
She is extremely biased in favor of consumers, and has shown this inclination time and again. Instant 170.6.

Other

Comment #: CA49431
Rating:1.0
Comments:
She doesn't care about the child's best interest. She knows nothing of family law. She is absolutely bias and just awful.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA49154
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge accepted only one party's evidence and not the others. She also overlooked contempt of court from respondent as the respondent withheld children for over 3 months with zero contact to the petitioning coparent. Respondent claimed the petiotioner was late picking up their children when in the original court order it stated that respondent was supposed to be dropping them off to petiotioner. The children have been affected by all this and are afraid that it will happen again. There is currently a petition on Facebook against this judge from a different party and source because others have had the same horrible experience with this Judge. Please help and spread the word.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA49104
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge accepted only one party's evidence and not the others. She also overlooked contempt of court from respondent as the respondent withheld children for over 3 months with zero contact to the petitioning coparent. Respondent claimed the petiotioner was late picking up their children when in the original court order it stated that respondent was supposed to be dropping them off to petiotioner. The children have been affected by all this and are afraid that it will happen again. There is currently a petition on Facebook against this judge from a different party and source because others have had the same horrible experience with this Judge. Please help and spread the word.

Other

Comment #: CA46726
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Absolutely horrible, not fare, doesn’t really know FAMILY Law.
Does not follow THERAPISTS recommendations!
Should be fired!!!
She has such approach that will eventually make children mentally unstable because of her poor judgement.