Hon. Gail A. Andler See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Orange County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   4.1 - 12 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Gail A. Andler


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA5315
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Irrational judge. To be dinged in all future cases. Has no explanation for the rulings she makes. Picks favorites, and then just simply rules in that party's favor without any comment as to why. Law and facts are to be disregarded in this courtroom. Spend your energy becoming a "friend" of this judge if you want any success there.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA5262
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Here's to hoping she will take her 20 years on the bench and let someone else do the judging now. Surely someplace like JAMS has an opening. Rude, impatient and spiteful are the three adjectives that first come to mind.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA5253
Rating:10.0
Comments:
One of best judges, lets you try your case without questioning your witnesses, stays out of it until there is an objection. Really knows the evidence code. I find her pleasant, smart, balanced. No hesitation at all bringing a plaintiffs case to her.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA5229
Rating:9.8
Comments:
The other comments make absolutely no sense to me. I've appeared in front of many OCSC judges, and IMO Judge Andler is the best or one of the best (certainly top three) judges in OC. She is very smart, exceptionally well prepared, and the only times I've seen her get a bit curt with counsel is when they have either been unprepared or unprofessional. Outstanding judge.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA4967
Rating:2.0
Comments:
I agree with the negative comments previously posted. Before I started dinging her, I found her to be frequently rude and demeaning to counsel, and lacking important knowledge both as to the law and as to the practical effect of her rulings. She doesn't seem to understand or care about the demands upon civil litigators. Her court clerk is just as bad. She is to be avoided.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA4944
Rating:1.1
Comments:
She is a horrid, pompous judge, who should be avoided.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA4891
Rating:1.8
Comments:
She picks a favorite early in any case and then stays with them, doing everything that party asks of her. She is generally lacking in intellect, and short-tempered, which must be the worst combo of traits that a judge could have.

Litigant

Comment #: CA4812
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge is driven by emotion; forget the facts.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA4682
Rating:3.3
Comments:
Female lawyers should beware Judge Andler. She is obnoxious to women in general, and seems to be often opposed to whatever they have said in court (which is curious for a female judge). Furthermore, she is highly likely to rule for the most politically connected litigant -- to the point that it appears that she is trying for higher office, or maybe for a JAMs position where the richest litigant is the best client. Solo practitioners should ding her.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA3948
Rating:1.4
Comments:
This judge not only accused me of not knowing the California Rules of Court, when in fact she was unaware of the rule in question, but did so in a rude and demeaning manner.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA3775
Rating:1.9
Comments:
Discourteous and impatient with new attorneys.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA3543
Rating:2.2
Comments:
Rude, slow and opinionated

Other

Comment #: CA3072
Rating:1.0
Comments:
rude, short tempered and defendant oriented, far too much focus on rigid rules of procedure than fairness

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA1334
Rating:4.7
Comments:
Judge Andler has a slow learning curve on complex matters.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA1247
Rating:9.6
Comments:
Great judge. Fair and even handed