Hon. Kim Garlin Dunning See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Orange County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   6.5 - 3 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Kim Garlin Dunning


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA7321
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Singularly one of the worst trial judges I have appeared before in over 30 years of practice, in multiple states and including federal court in several states. Refuses to discuss evidentiary rulings in a bench trial, despite the fact that she seems to be unfamiliar with the Evidence Code. Completely lacking in judicial temperament and was verbally abusive and openly hostile to me. Clearly plays favorites to the point of refusing to follow the law and puts her refusal on the record and tells you how it will be done in her courtroom notwithstanding things like the Code of Civil Procedure. She refuses to check citations. Unless you are a local lawyer, do not even think twice, never take her. In a nutshell, she is no more qualified to be on the bench than I am to perform a heart transplant

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA6619
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Really good judge. Listens to all facts, for as long as necessary, and then rules. Very fair-minded. Reads all papers.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA4816
Rating:8.8
Comments:
She is brilliant.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA129
Rating:9.8
Comments:
I had her as a DDA on at least one case and I find her to be much more evenhanded as a judge, as she should be.