Hon. Erick L. Larsh See Rating Details
Superior Court
Orange County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   5.7 - 4 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

What others have said about Hon. Erick L. Larsh


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA8965
Unfit to sit. Took bench 40 minutes late without explanation or apology. Suggested client's absence due to medical cause was fabricated notwithstanding no evidence to support; issued bench warrant for client's arrest while client being prepped for endoscopy/colonoscopy for post-cancer follow-up testing.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA7851
Does not know the law, will NOT make a ruling, extremely prejudical to allowing hearsay, recesses in the middle of trial constantly then forgets whats happening in his courtroom

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA565
Excellant judge he will work with you.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA539
A fair judge, you will get to argue your case, and he will hear you out and you will get a fair opinion