Hon. Colleen M. Nichols See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Placer County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.7 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   5.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Colleen M. Nichols


Comments


Other

Comment #: CA6100
Rating:10.0
Comments:
I have witnessed Judge Nichols in multiple settings; drug court, family court and criminal court. In all environments Judge Nichols hold true to the meaning of justice, if a defendant is doing well she encourages them and proceeds with grace. If a defendant is not doing well Judge Nichols will not "co" their behavior yet still encourages. What impressed me most about her in the court room is her expectation of respect, if someone falls short she will not tolerate it. I have immense respect for her as a judge and a person. I am so confident in Judge Nichols that I have to believe that the negative feedback posted by others must be due to a failed attempt to manipulate their circumstances. I know Judge Nichols would not prevent reunification between a parent and their child unless she had solid evidence that the reunification would not be in the best interest of all concerned.

Litigant

Comment #: CA4202
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Nichols's actions from the bench are a disgrace to the office she holds, and an unfortunate disservice to the people she should be representing.Her performance from the bench in dependency court is an egregious example of a kangaroo court. She seems to be there only to support local CPS, regardless of the best interests of the child. She openly refused to allow testimony and evidence, and clearly does not support due process. It is a shame because she seems intelligent enough to do the job well, but somewhere along the way she forgot how to do the right thing even if it means holding her local colleagues accountable. Unfortunately she seems to be eager to punish parents without just cause, based solely on reports by case workers who are unqualified to perform any forensic investigating. Case workers often report based on their emotional feelings which the court accepts as fact. Judge Nichols does not want to hear evidence that local case workers have abused the process.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA3805
Rating:2.3
Comments:
Years ago I used to appear before her when she was a commissioner in juvenile dependency cases, where I represented the parents who had their children taken away by CPS. After losing about my 10th straight trial in front of her, I spoke with one of the staff members and asked her what I was doing wrong. She told me I wasn't doing anything wrong. She had been there three years and had never seen a parent win a contested hearing before Commissioner Nichols. At first I really liked her, but as time went on I could see her becoming more and more jaded and biased, like "she'd heard it all before" when someone was crying their eyes out because CPS snatched their kids away from them in the middle of the night. It's too bad that she ended up like this. She could have been much better. Somewhere along the line she lost her heart, I guess.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA3589
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
The really frightening thing is this judge is not the worst judge in the county! She is the former baby-sitter of an older judge with connections to the governor's office. The same graybeard earlier got his paramour, Frances Kearney on the bench.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA3136
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge is a terrifying combination of Mary Poppins and Pontius Pilate. She sends people to prison with a smile on her face and possesses the most irritating "positive attitude" on the bench. She is nothing more than a glorified secretary whose only skill is setting the next court date. She has a patronizing and sanctimonious attitude towards defendants and defense attorneys. Her favorite line: "We all make choices and those choices have consequences!" Maybe if she had a backbone and stood up to the DA once and a while, she might find out what she's supposed to be doing up there.