Hon. Allen H. Sumner See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Sacramento County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   6.8 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   5.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Allen H. Sumner


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA12611
Rating:3.6
Comments:
If you are pro se you are SOL! He is so far removed from fair and unbiased that he will bend over backwards and makes stupid and unnecessary digs. I don't think he reads petitions because he cherry picks what he rules/offers opinions on and he got it wrong! See you in appeals!

Litigant

Comment #: CA12610
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I did research about this judge when my writ was transferred and I don't know who wrote the other reviews because this man was the most insensitive pompous jerk in his findings. He is one sided and arrogant and not once did he acknowledge valid issues raised. He said he could not do anything and what he meant was "not my problem too bad you got screwed" other judges at least acknowledged an ill gotten gain or unjust/fair situation but he does not care and will rub salt in a wound with sarcastic and unnecessary statements. He is the type of judge that makes you hate the judicial system, if you can get Dept 31 or 44, you will have a better experience and they see people not cases. This man doesn't even ensure professional treatment is extended but oh yeah, he does not give it either.

Litigant

Comment #: CA3413
Rating:9.0
Comments:
I had a very difficult case and he was one that treated me with respect and he was very fair, even when he told me which part NO did I not understand! LOL

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA1475
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Excellent judge. Very knowledgeable and patient. Sticks to statutes