Hon. Carol W. Overton See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Santa Clara County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   5.4 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Carol W. Overton


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA7776
Rating:4.4
Comments:
Actually is a nice person. Was a much better criminal court judge than civil judge. Now on Civil Bench, always interrupting while counsel are trying to argue their case or make a point; seems to lean towards to underdog and especially In Pro Per Parties. Bends over backwards to make them happy. Very gullible. Never practiced on her own; always worked a government job. Lacks the everyday understanding of what attorneys have to go through to deal with In Pro Per parties who owe money and simply lie in court and to everyone else. Needs vast improvement.

Court Staff

Comment #: CA6438
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge is the worse judge ever. She ignores evidence, takes side of bad guys when she knew they repeatedly cheating and lying to people. Very disappointed.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA2875
Rating:6.3
Comments:
Base on 7/19/2012 CMC hearing