Hon. Brian F. Haynes See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Contra Costa County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   8.5 - 3 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   10.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Brian F. Haynes


Comments


Other

Comment #: CA31134
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
CA31132

Don't blame the Mac -the Mac did not write your highly improper posts-you wrote them--get a hold of yourself.

Other

Comment #: CA30999
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Sounds like a disgruntled lawyer, with an axe to grind, writing these comments, pushing down previous comments on judges, he is in bed with .

Look at pattern and timing , when each one was written and comments, that just proceeded these comments--The the same type of comments, timing, written on numerous other judges and offer no value to this forum..

Other

Comment #: CA24897
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I am very disappointed in the gangster actions of this judge. It is completely inappropriate to smile and shine at the parent in tears, who were accused of not committing, and whose child had been taken away. Your remark that I want to pity you is a mockery. I do not want to pity you, you confuse your role, you are not an omnipotent ruler to try to pity you. You behave yourself disrespectfully, not ethically, aggressively as a maniac.

Other

Comment #: CA19212
Rating:10.0
Comments:
My two teenage daughters and I are so truly grateful for Honorable Judge Haynes. We have been down a long 17 year road of physical, verbal, emotional abuse and infidelity. Over the years, my ex-husband has had several drug related and domestic violence charges, several PD and CFS reports, two CFS open cases, two domestic violence restraining orders. Several Family Court hearings for divorce, restraining orders, child custody. I have fought and protected my girls over the years with everything that I have, physically, emotionally and financially. After several years of filing motions and my oldest almost 18, Judge Haynes was very patient with our case, praised our girls with their statements and declarations to the court, he honored our girls statements and requests for custody and visitation. Granting me full custody with every other weekend visitation. My girls and I will be eternally grateful to you Judge Haynes for considering our ongoing issues and concerns. God Bless You!

Other

Comment #: CA12822
Rating:10.0
Comments:
I accompanied my son to his first custody appointment in front of judge haynes. We were the last case and I had the privilege of watching all the others before us. In each case he displayed patience, kindness and wisdo. My son and I are convinced that had he not taken the time to speak from his heart to him and his son's mother, the outcome would have been bad. Even though our case is intricate and will require time to settle, we get to see our little boy. Thank you "bald stranger"!

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA12011
Rating:8.9
Comments:
Great at fairness. Poor on knowledge of California statue regarding search warrants.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA10793
Rating:8.3
Comments:
This judge has the best temperament of any judge I've been in front of. Very even-keeled. Like many superior court judges, he does not seem to have a good grasp of evidentiary objections. When a judge wants to hear something, they over-rule the objection. I objected based on foundation (the evidence did not state a date or time), he over-ruled by stating that it was an admission (this is an exception to the hearsay rule). But, like I said, a lot of superior court judges forget about the rules of evidence when they are interested in the information. It did not affect the outcome of the case, but had he followed the rules of evidence, I would have given a higher rating.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA10792
Rating:8.3
Comments:
This is the most patient judge I have ever been in front of. He is very kind to all of the participants. Bravo! He still reflects the typical paternalistic bias in favor of mothers in family court, that is typical of Contra Costa judges. It will be interesting to see how he develops in this role in family court.