Hon. Glenda S. Allen-Hill See Rating Details
Superior Court
Fresno County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   6.6 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Please type what you see below:


What others have said about Hon. Glenda S. Allen-Hill


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA26236
Terrible biased judge she should not be a judge due to the fact her daughter got the shot beat out of her and now she takes it out in every male that enters her court room. She also never believes anything any male says about the case when she is wrong she won’t admit to it she also was practicing law without the correct credentials for years before it was publicly announced after that she was quick to complete the needed courses to continue working as a judge. I recently did a article on a male she gave 1 year in prison because he was accused of sending a threatening text message. There was no evidence that he sent it and when the lawyer showed how people can spoof numbers and literally send messages to whomever with the sender number displayed as any number they chose that was thrown out of the case because she didn’t think the girl would do that. Two years later the girl was recorded admitting to having the message sent to frame her ex bf because he was in a new relationship and wanted to get him arrested. This is a judge that should be stripped from her credentials and sent to a anger management class


Comment #: CA24346
She is narrow minded, racist, and a man hater. She blatantly ignores facts that don't fit her desired outcome.She is not a fit or fair judge.


Comment #: CA5611
Rating:Not Rated
Heavily leans toward the woman in family law matters. Not consistent at all.

Example: Orders psych eval on both parents. Dad pays $2500 and does psych eval. Mom does not. Come back to court, no consequence for mom's failure to comply.

Mom consistently violated court orders and this judge did nothing when brought to her attention.

Additionally, she is consistently late. Often more than an hour late. She then runs her calendars until finished, keeping her staff late. Has the nerve to chastise anyone late on the day she is on time.