Hon. Teresa A. Beaudet See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Los Angeles County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   2.2 - 4 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   4.0 - 3 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Teresa A. Beaudet


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA17677
Rating:1.5
Comments:
She is a jerk to both lawyers. She is unpleasant and a disgrace to the Bench. I have practiced 20 years and never seen worse. I have reviewed 4 judges on this site, and she is the worst. When we settled on the day of trial she made an attempt to force us to disclose the terms of settlement. As a lawyer should know, it is none of her business. She then demanded plaintiff to be present to state on the record that she accepted the settlement. Also not required since plaintiff's counsel was there to speak for plaintiff. Beaudet said that was not acceptable. She makes everything a nightmare

Litigant

Comment #: CA13859
Rating:2.0
Comments:
I have not seen another judge display a belligerence and lack of partiality. A (1) would be too generous.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA11986
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
She is extremely bias. She fails to apply the same rules to represented parties as self-represented litigants. She holds pro pers to a higher standard. I have witnessed a pro per kicking an attorney's *** and she totally intervened by instructing the attorney on how to proceed by moving ex parte. She's a disgrace.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA11934
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Simply a bad judge. Maybe she was okay in family law but not at all qualified to be a judge in a civil court.

Court Staff

Comment #: CA10337
Rating:1.0
Comments:
she is so bias as soon as one person stands in front of her you know they are going to win or lose with her demenear towards them

Litigant

Comment #: CA9963
Rating:9.0
Comments:
This judge is what you would wish to have . She is intensly focused, fair and
down to earth. I wish had more like her, excellent

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA9685
Rating:4.7
Comments:
Judge Beaudet suffers from black robitis. She has rules that are entirely her own, that differ from regular practice. For example, only in her courtroom is ex parte notice by email or fax insufficient. She requires telephone or in person notice, notwithstanding the Rutter Guide's advice to the contrary. She also refuses to come out onto the bench for ex parte applications, even when a status conference was previously scheduled. Absolutely rigid on scheduling; will not move pre-trial dates, even when all parties consent. She makes clear that she does not view herself as a public servant to help move cases along; rather, the parties must work around her rigid rules and schedule.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA4264
Rating:1.5
Comments:
Given the choice of Judge Beaudet or a dart board, always take the dart board.