Hon. Reva G. Goetz See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Los Angeles County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Reva G. Goetz


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: CA5258
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Reva Goetz participated in fraud upon the court when trust funds were misappropriated by attorneys for the trustees and left a beneficiary defrauded of over $1 million. She did nothing to stop the attorneys from decimating the trust and then coerced the beneficiary to drop an appeal of her unlawful rulings. She ignored a disabled beneficiary's pleas for basic needs, countenanced dishonest attorneys' fraud upon the court, and did nothing when confronted with the trustees violation of court orders to make a two distributions. She failed to hear Petition to remove the trustees for years and failed to hear the trust's account for 4 1/2 years. She failed to order a Special Needs Trust funded as required by the administrative trust until all of the money went missing at the hands of the trustees. She made findings the trustees wasted the trust but then allowed it to continue for years until millions of dollars went missing. This judge is so corrupt, the voters should vote her out. ALso, here demeaner is so bad, attorneys do not want their cases in front of her. No honest attorney would.