Hon. Yolanda Orozco See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Los Angeles County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   6.9 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Yolanda Orozco


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: CA10351
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Biased, no respect for the law where she completely ignored the due process and granted an ex parte that was not served, and it did not even conform to the CRC rules in that declaration wasn't sufficient, and did not show irreparable harm, immediate danger as required under the law.

Other

Comment #: CA8146
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
This judge is extremely rude. Does not listen to litigant. Refused to allow a person who was abused to speak. Does not apply the law. Something has to be done to clean up the courts so that injured people can get help. These people run the place and don't care about the law or people's rights. No one is stopping them or sanctioning them.

Litigant

Comment #: CA8141
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Did not want to listen to Evidence. Biased and opinions are not based on facts. Rude and dismissive.