Hon. Benny C. Osorio See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Los Angeles County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   6.4 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Benny C. Osorio


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA4170
Rating:6.4
Comments:
I sat in Judge Osorio's courtroom a few months back, after the layoffs in the Los Angeles courts. One thing that struck me was that he denied a creditor's motion to compel because the introductory language in the creditor's discovery requests cited to the old CCP sections (e.g., "Please take notice that, pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 2033...") The debtor/defendant did not appear. This told me two things: 1) that he's a stickler for details; and 2) that he could be pro-consumer. His discovery sanctions awards were extremely modest where granted (people asking for $1,000 got $300). He has a good sense of humor and kept things light. Seems like a decent judge.